NEW GENERAL FREE AGENCY/TRADE THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 441, 442, 443 ... 2566, 2567, 2568  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JUST-MING
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 44000

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 8:44 am    Post subject:

When have the Pacers ever tanked?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 8:44 am    Post subject:

Balto wrote:
Wrong, Nunn+Gab+Christie work. Not saying we should...BUT Rob does have the salary if he wants to make it happen.


The Suns aren't likely to consider a 3-for-1 trade
_________________
Internet Argument Resolved
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25092

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 8:46 am    Post subject:

How bout Nunn+SRP for Precious? He taller
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JUST-MING
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 44000

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 8:49 am    Post subject:

The offers for Jae Crowder are likely terrible. Lamar Odom only got us a second round pick.

I expect Jae Crowder to negotiate a buyout.


Last edited by JUST-MING on Wed Sep 28, 2022 8:52 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Balto
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 25 Jun 2019
Posts: 603

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 8:50 am    Post subject:

Aeneas Hunter wrote:
Balto wrote:
Wrong, Nunn+Gab+Christie work. Not saying we should...BUT Rob does have the salary if he wants to make it happen.


The Suns aren't likely to consider a 3-for-1 trade


Reports are that they are looking for a guard. Could they just waive Gab after the trade?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reds622
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 May 2015
Posts: 1398

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:00 am    Post subject:

Does Westbrook have more value as a large expiring contract with very little money left as we approach the trade deadline? I think he probably does.

Does a large expiring, a young player off the roster, + the 2 FRP get you something during the season? I think that’s what the Lakers are banking on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
deal
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Aug 2008
Posts: 14916
Location: Earth

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:04 am    Post subject:

JUST-MING wrote:
The offers for Jae Crowder are likely terrible. Lamar Odom only got us a second round pick.

I expect Jae Crowder to negotiate a buyout.



A buyout for him only makes sense if there is some other
team going to pony up any lost money in that buy out. Possible
because it could only be a couple of $$mm.

We'll see
_________________
Lakers need to build a freaking team !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Balto
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 25 Jun 2019
Posts: 603

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:06 am    Post subject:

Reds622 wrote:
Does Westbrook have more value as a large expiring contract with very little money left as we approach the trade deadline? I think he probably does.

Does a large expiring, a young player off the roster, + the 2 FRP get you something during the season? I think that’s what the Lakers are banking on.


I think your exactly right! Not 100% sure how Westbrook's contract is structured but if its spread out then that means about $24M will have been paid by the Lakers but still count as a $47M expiring contract.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nomoreshaq
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 5143

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:14 am    Post subject:

To LA: Turner, Hield, Crowder
To Indiana: Russ, 1st rounder
To Suns: Nunn, 2nd rounder

Well that completely changes the way our team looks:

Turner
AD/Crowder
LBJ/JTA
Hield/Walker/Reaves
Schroder/Bev

Bryant
Jones
Brown
Christie
Gabriel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46727

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:17 am    Post subject:

FWIW Pacers writer Bob Kravitz who works for TheAthletic said that Turner can be traded at any moment and he bought up the Lakers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:17 am    Post subject:

Reds622 wrote:
Does Westbrook have more value as a large expiring contract with very little money left as we approach the trade deadline? I think he probably does.

Does a large expiring, a young player off the roster, + the 2 FRP get you something during the season? I think that’s what the Lakers are banking on.


I don't think that Westbrook has any real value as an expiring contract. What team is looking for a $47M expiring contract? In other words, who wants to wipe out almost half of their payroll? It's possible that someone would want to do this, but the sheer size of the Westbrook contract is problematic. However . . . this makes sense only if the other team is shipping us contracts with multiple years remaining, which is not what we want. Otherwise, the other team could just let its own contracts expire.

I think it's more accurate to say that the negativity of the Westbrook contract will decline as the season progresses. If the other team would pay $20M instead of $40M, that changes the dynamics. But if we want to get something good as part of the deal, we'll still need to put an FRP or two on the table. And that's even more problematic at mid-season, especially if we're just getting a two-month rental on someone like Turner.
_________________
Internet Argument Resolved
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JUST-MING
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 44000

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:17 am    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
FWIW Pacers writer Bob Kravitz who works for TheAthletic said that Turner can be traded at any moment and he bought up the Lakers.


Nothing on Pacers Digest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:19 am    Post subject:

JUST-MING wrote:
The offers for Jae Crowder are likely terrible. Lamar Odom only got us a second round pick.

I expect Jae Crowder to negotiate a buyout.



I think the Crowder situation is more like Andre Iguodala at Memphis than Odom, where Andre sat at home collecting his paycheck for most of the season until Memphis finally found a deal for him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46727

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:23 am    Post subject:

JUST-MING wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
FWIW Pacers writer Bob Kravitz who works for TheAthletic said that Turner can be traded at any moment and he bought up the Lakers.


Nothing on Pacers Digest.


Pacers Digest is a stupid forum

https://theathletic.com/3633420/2022/09/27/myles-turner-pacers-trade-lakers/?source=emp_shared_article
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nomoreshaq
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Posts: 5143

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:24 am    Post subject:

Aeneas Hunter wrote:
Reds622 wrote:
Does Westbrook have more value as a large expiring contract with very little money left as we approach the trade deadline? I think he probably does.

Does a large expiring, a young player off the roster, + the 2 FRP get you something during the season? I think that’s what the Lakers are banking on.


I don't think that Westbrook has any real value as an expiring contract. What team is looking for a $47M expiring contract? In other words, who wants to wipe out almost half of their payroll? It's possible that someone would want to do this, but the sheer size of the Westbrook contract is problematic. However . . . this makes sense only if the other team is shipping us contracts with multiple years remaining, which is not what we want. Otherwise, the other team could just let its own contracts expire.

I think it's more accurate to say that the negativity of the Westbrook contract will decline as the season progresses. If the other team would pay $20M instead of $40M, that changes the dynamics. But if we want to get something good as part of the deal, we'll still need to put an FRP or two on the table. And that's even more problematic at mid-season, especially if we're just getting a two-month rental on someone like Turner.


a tanking team. if ainge wasnt an idiot he could have guaranteed a tank job
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epic_
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Jan 2020
Posts: 11310

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:38 am    Post subject:

Some still want Turner?
_________________
💜💛 🏆 👀 🍖 #18!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46727

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:42 am    Post subject:

epic_ wrote:
Some still want Turner?


As long as he stays healthy he adds a dynamic style on this team next AD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
2019
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 10832

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:50 am    Post subject:

nomoreshaq wrote:
To LA: Turner, Hield, Crowder
To Indiana: Russ, 1st rounder
To Suns: Nunn, 2nd rounder

Well that completely changes the way our team looks:

Turner
AD/Crowder
LBJ/JTA
Hield/Walker/Reaves
Schroder/Bev

Bryant
Jones
Brown
Christie
Gabriel


Per report, Indy has been offered one 1st pick from Lakers. They want two. This is a great trade as presented as the pieces are fantastic fits, but it still takes two 1sts to get this done.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:52 am    Post subject:

nomoreshaq wrote:
a tanking team. if ainge wasnt an idiot he could have guaranteed a tank job


He isn't, and he did.
_________________
Internet Argument Resolved
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144477
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 10:35 am    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
https://mobile.twitter.com/TheNBACentral/status/1575129296091455489


If Crowder is dealt, I will be surprised if it is to a team in the West.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Reds622
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 May 2015
Posts: 1398

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 10:56 am    Post subject:

Aeneas Hunter wrote:
Reds622 wrote:
Does Westbrook have more value as a large expiring contract with very little money left as we approach the trade deadline? I think he probably does.

Does a large expiring, a young player off the roster, + the 2 FRP get you something during the season? I think that’s what the Lakers are banking on.


I don't think that Westbrook has any real value as an expiring contract. What team is looking for a $47M expiring contract? In other words, who wants to wipe out almost half of their payroll? It's possible that someone would want to do this, but the sheer size of the Westbrook contract is problematic. However . . . this makes sense only if the other team is shipping us contracts with multiple years remaining, which is not what we want. Otherwise, the other team could just let its own contracts expire.

I think it's more accurate to say that the negativity of the Westbrook contract will decline as the season progresses. If the other team would pay $20M instead of $40M, that changes the dynamics. But if we want to get something good as part of the deal, we'll still need to put an FRP or two on the table. And that's even more problematic at mid-season, especially if we're just getting a two-month rental on someone like Turner.


You make good points.

If there was a player with multiple years that the Lakers actually wanted… then I think they would pull the trigger while giving that other team massive cap relief. Obviously the Lakers aren’t going to trade away their cap relief this summer for multiple players with multiple years left on their deal.

They would obviously do it for a player that they felt was worth giving up that upcoming cap relief. A young player with a huge deal? Perhaps.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pjiddy
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Dec 2005
Posts: 29084

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 11:00 am    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
FWIW Pacers writer Bob Kravitz who works for TheAthletic said that Turner can be traded at any moment and he bought up the Lakers.


Feel like the bigger story here is that Jeanie sold the team to a Pacers beat writer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 11:06 am    Post subject:

Reds622 wrote:
Aeneas Hunter wrote:
Reds622 wrote:
Does Westbrook have more value as a large expiring contract with very little money left as we approach the trade deadline? I think he probably does.

Does a large expiring, a young player off the roster, + the 2 FRP get you something during the season? I think that’s what the Lakers are banking on.


I don't think that Westbrook has any real value as an expiring contract. What team is looking for a $47M expiring contract? In other words, who wants to wipe out almost half of their payroll? It's possible that someone would want to do this, but the sheer size of the Westbrook contract is problematic. However . . . this makes sense only if the other team is shipping us contracts with multiple years remaining, which is not what we want. Otherwise, the other team could just let its own contracts expire.

I think it's more accurate to say that the negativity of the Westbrook contract will decline as the season progresses. If the other team would pay $20M instead of $40M, that changes the dynamics. But if we want to get something good as part of the deal, we'll still need to put an FRP or two on the table. And that's even more problematic at mid-season, especially if we're just getting a two-month rental on someone like Turner.


You make good points.

If there was a player with multiple years that the Lakers actually wanted… then I think they would pull the trigger while giving that other team massive cap relief. Obviously the Lakers aren’t going to trade away their cap relief this summer for multiple players with multiple years left on their deal.

They would obviously do it for a player that they felt was worth giving up that upcoming cap relief. A young player with a huge deal? Perhaps.


I think that's right. There is a possibility that something will happen during the season to make a star or near-star quality player available from a team that wants to get out of the luxury tax, or something like that. You just never know about this stuff.
_________________
Internet Argument Resolved
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
logical24
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Jun 2019
Posts: 3193

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 11:17 am    Post subject:

If IND took Russ/1 1st for Buddy/Myles we would get a 7m trade exception from it no? 40m > 47m
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Balto
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 25 Jun 2019
Posts: 603

PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2022 11:26 am    Post subject:

logical24 wrote:
If IND took Russ/1 1st for Buddy/Myles we would get a 7m trade exception from it no? 40m > 47m


Correct, but one report said they would want Lakers to also take on Theis which would then mean the overall trade would add an additional $800k to the Lakers. Not a ton
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 441, 442, 443 ... 2566, 2567, 2568  Next
Page 442 of 2568
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB