***LAKERS -vs- Spurs 2/3/11 Game Thread***
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 71, 72, 73
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Game Updates Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
k4lakers
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 18609
Location: LA, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:03 pm    Post subject:

Rick12322 wrote:
Well, all you "defense wins games" (bleep), our defense was there, but we lost. We lost because it takes Defense + Offense.


The game was lost on 4 chances to get a defensive stop and they couldn't even be bothered to box out. Don't even get me started on all of those wide open 3's.
_________________
Rest In Paradise Kobe & GiGi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
heheh1
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 4240

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:04 pm    Post subject:

THE_SHOES wrote:
I would have rather lost by 10... This is bothering me...


Just fap.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ppineda
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 12 Aug 2003
Posts: 701

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:47 pm    Post subject:

mhan00 wrote:
Sleepy wrote:
Would have liked them to go 2 for 1 on that. Could cost them the game.


Two for ones are overrated. Mostly just an excuse for players to take bad shots.


Two for one is one of the best things a team can do, and really successful teams do it well. And it doesn't mean that at 30 seconds left take a half court shot. It means get into your set offense a little earlier and take your shot, but around 30 seconds. It give you options incase you miss and they don't. allows you to be flexible with fouling and extending the game. And also, gives you the all important control of the ball with the game on the line scenario. How can you not want 2 for 1? not doing 2 for 1 is just bad clock management.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mhan00
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 32071

PostPosted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:51 pm    Post subject:

ppineda wrote:
mhan00 wrote:
Sleepy wrote:
Would have liked them to go 2 for 1 on that. Could cost them the game.


Two for ones are overrated. Mostly just an excuse for players to take bad shots.


Two for one is one of the best things a team can do, and really successful teams do it well. And it doesn't mean that at 30 seconds left take a half court shot. It means get into your set offense a little earlier and take your shot, but around 30 seconds. It give you options incase you miss and they don't. allows you to be flexible with fouling and extending the game. And also, gives you the all important control of the ball with the game on the line scenario. How can you not want 2 for 1?


if you can get a good look and it just happens to give you a decent two for one situation, then that's perfect. but too often players take it as license to just jack up terrible shots that have very little chance of going in, thereby either giving the other team a transition opportunity or a chance to use up a lot of the 24 second clock to get themselves a good look. Then you get the ball back with often times 6 or less seconds on the clock to try to generate another look, which will most likely be a tough shot with very little chance of going in either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message ICQ Number Reply with quote
babyskyhook
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 18492
Location: The Garden Island

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:45 am    Post subject:

mhan00 wrote:
ppineda wrote:
mhan00 wrote:
Sleepy wrote:
Would have liked them to go 2 for 1 on that. Could cost them the game.


Two for ones are overrated. Mostly just an excuse for players to take bad shots.


Two for one is one of the best things a team can do, and really successful teams do it well. And it doesn't mean that at 30 seconds left take a half court shot. It means get into your set offense a little earlier and take your shot, but around 30 seconds. It give you options incase you miss and they don't. allows you to be flexible with fouling and extending the game. And also, gives you the all important control of the ball with the game on the line scenario. How can you not want 2 for 1?


if you can get a good look and it just happens to give you a decent two for one situation, then that's perfect. but too often players take it as license to just jack up terrible shots that have very little chance of going in, thereby either giving the other team a transition opportunity or a chance to use up a lot of the 24 second clock to get themselves a good look. Then you get the ball back with often times 6 or less seconds on the clock to try to generate another look, which will most likely be a tough shot with very little chance of going in either.


YEs- 2 for 1 is great IF and only if you can get a quality look for your first shot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
babyskyhook
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 18492
Location: The Garden Island

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:47 am    Post subject:

k4lakers wrote:
Rick12322 wrote:
Well, all you "defense wins games" (bleep), our defense was there, but we lost. We lost because it takes Defense + Offense.


The game was lost on 4 chances to get a defensive stop and they couldn't even be bothered to box out. Don't even get me started on all of those wide open 3's.



Yes- those were defensive rebounds that the Lakers failed to secure.


As usual though, game was won/lost by a combination of offensive and defensive execution. Good execution on one end feeds it on the other.

There is no success without both.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
shansen008
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 3568

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 1:05 am    Post subject:

babyskyhook wrote:
Rick12322 wrote:
Now we know why SA has such a good record, they were able to call the game fair because it was close, then Kobe draws a clear as say charge on Parker and bam, the damage is done. then they count McDyss' offensive interference putback.



It was a charge, but that's not going to be called very often in that situation.

Dyess' putback was clean.


Gotta love this...this is how complacent fans have become. We EXPECT the rulebook to not be followed. Stern wins.

I know i know, they are gonna let the players decide right, they never call fouls on those last second platys right?

*cough* except when we play boston and they get rewarded free throws on a halfcourt heave with a second left *cough*

The double standard in this league when it comes to my favorite team SICKENS me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lalakersfan88
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Jun 2008
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:38 am    Post subject:

even though gregg poppovich is calling the lakers the best team in the west. in my opinion he is saying that to add pressure to the lakers. it keeps the lakers at bay to perform well or get beaten up by the media.

however, the regular season is nothing, its all about the playoffs.

GO LAKERS!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Game Updates All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 71, 72, 73
Page 73 of 73
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB