*** Los Angeles Lakers vs Boston Celtics (12/25/23) Gm#31 ***
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 26, 27, 28  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Game Updates Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
farzadkavari
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 557

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 4:33 pm    Post subject:

It's time for serious trade talk. This team isn't it!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46948

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 4:35 pm    Post subject:

governator wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
TMG wrote:
windycitycane wrote:
.500 boys. It is what it is.


This team is better than .500

Contenders no but we're better than .500

Boston is a juggernaut of a team. Best team in the league if healthy.

I can honestly say at our best we can hang with anyone.

Too bad for some reason our coach cant adress the 1Q issues with this team.

I have no idea why he doesn't go for an early timeout whenever he sees the team letting up early.


Dude we can’t hang with anyone only to bottom feeders if our complimentary players have disappearing acts


If we’re not a contender then it’s time to move on from LeBron or trade up to become a contender with LeBron, can’t be stuck


LeBron has no trade value in a sense that if we trade him the Lakers are gonna want a major haul and LeBron’s camp wouldn’t want team trading for him to give up the farm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KingKobe20
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 18738
Location: L.A County, 26 miles away from Staples Center

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 4:36 pm    Post subject:

Next 5:

Hornets
@Twolves
@Pelicans
Heat
Grizzlies
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Valdarno
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 17 Nov 2022
Posts: 217

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 4:36 pm    Post subject:

Nash Vegas wrote:
ocho wrote:
Wood can’t be worse than what Hayes is giving us. At least he can score.


If Hayes is getting burned on defense, you might as well just use Wood.


Can't a bleeping reporter ask Ham why he is not playing Wood???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Kblo247!
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Oct 2015
Posts: 4024

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 4:37 pm    Post subject:

Valdarno wrote:
Nash Vegas wrote:
ocho wrote:
Wood can’t be worse than what Hayes is giving us. At least he can score.


If Hayes is getting burned on defense, you might as well just use Wood.


Can't a bleeping reporter ask Ham why he is not playing Wood???


Most likely the same deacon every coach before him stopped playing him, not talent but attitude and other (bleep) … been the same on every team he’s on. He’s a 17 and 9 guy but every coach gets tired of him and every front office gets rid of him
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Polarbear
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Nov 2003
Posts: 6129

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 4:43 pm    Post subject:

The real question is if Hayes obviously isn’t it? Why are we not bringing along: Castleton


Yes, he’s going to get out muscle at times because he needs to get in the weight room, but he actually has skill both offensively defensively
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JustaObserver
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 May 2017
Posts: 3330

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 4:53 pm    Post subject:

Polarbear wrote:
The real question is if Hayes obviously isn’t it? Why are we not bringing along: Castleton


Yes, he’s going to get out muscle at times because he needs to get in the weight room, but he actually has skill both offensively defensively


Ham says No...maintain business as usual..hands back in pockets.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JerryWest_44
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 22 May 2004
Posts: 25574

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:04 pm    Post subject:

First quarter disaster
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersken80
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38904

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:07 pm    Post subject:

TMG wrote:
windycitycane wrote:
.500 boys. It is what it is.


This team is better than .500

Contenders no but we're better than .500

Boston is a juggernaut of a team. Best team in the league if healthy.

I can honestly say at our best we can hang with anyone.

Too bad for some reason our coach cant adress the 1Q issues with this team.

I have no idea why he doesn't go for an early timeout whenever he sees the team letting up early.


You are what your record says it is....right now they are an average team. The in season tournament seems so long ago.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersfever714
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Jan 2016
Posts: 12069

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:20 pm    Post subject:

Headcoach or roster? So fire Ham or fire Pelinka? Because I'm tired of seeing average, middle of the road performance that gets us nowhere.

Jeanie isn't as passionate about the Lakers/Celtics rivalry as her dad. If she was, heads would roll righr now.
_________________
Playoffs is good enough. - Jeanie Buss 2024
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
anth2000
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Apr 2001
Posts: 12290
Location: Pasadena, CA

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:27 pm    Post subject:

lakersfever714 wrote:
Headcoach or roster? So fire Ham or fire Pelinka? Because I'm tired of seeing average, middle of the road performance that gets us nowhere.

Jeanie isn't as passionate about the Lakers/Celtics rivalry as her dad. If she was, heads would roll righr now.


Jeanie the idiot is into Women in Wrestling.
Moron, that woman.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 17183

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:38 pm    Post subject:

We were picked as a contender by media and a lot here. It’s early.
_________________
Kobe.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Clw9scopegx/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
1995Lakers
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 4551

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:41 pm    Post subject:

Jarred Vanderbilt sucks.....I am going to keep saying it. The DUDE SUCKS. Stop playing him until he proves he can shoot. The guy is a one man wrecking crew on offense and is a big reason LA lost today with the way he clogged the paint and allowing Porzingis to roam. I would happily dump Vanderbilt over Rui. Rui can win playoff games for you. Vanderbilt will only ruin playoff games for you cause of the spacing issues and because he isnt a playoff performer.

Last edited by 1995Lakers on Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JUST-MING
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 44135

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:42 pm    Post subject:

Polarbear wrote:
The real question is if Hayes obviously isn’t it? Why are we not bringing along: Castleton


Yes, he’s going to get out muscle at times because he needs to get in the weight room, but he actually has skill both offensively defensively


I like this idea .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
1995Lakers
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 4551

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:44 pm    Post subject:

Hayes is another one that is just plain horrible. Just play small and D'Lo more minutes than give anything to the useless Sideshow Bob Hayes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TDRock
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 27 May 2010
Posts: 49697
Location: LA to the Bay

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 5:59 pm    Post subject:

Valdarno wrote:
Nash Vegas wrote:
ocho wrote:
Wood can’t be worse than what Hayes is giving us. At least he can score.


If Hayes is getting burned on defense, you might as well just use Wood.


Can't a bleeping reporter ask Ham why he is not playing Wood???


I feel like Woike did once and Ham danced around the question
_________________
#IStillBelieveTaurean
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Dominic1981
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Feb 2022
Posts: 1058

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 6:20 pm    Post subject:

Porzingis and Holiday give the Celtics a different gear than they had before. When you have 4 guys that could all be big scorers, with Tatum/Brown now in their primes it’d be a disappointing season if they didn’t win it all. They should have never lost to the Heat last year and this year I can def see them beating the Nuggets in the Finals again. Can the Bucks stop them? Doubtful
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Zillethai
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Dec 2017
Posts: 1178

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 6:45 pm    Post subject:

Lakers are a mid level team.. along with the Warriors and Rockets and Suns.


Nuggets, Clippers, OKC, T Wolves, Mavs, Kings are all above them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Hard_Butter
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 12245
Location: The Two One Three

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 7:35 pm    Post subject:

BirdMagicLegend wrote:
Woohoo!

Beat LA!!

It's always great Christmas present to beat the Lakers.


{profanity deleted by alpha}

But do have a Merry Christmas, you filthy animal.
_________________
The butter's hard and the eggs are chillin' in the dark.

Kiss my Converse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
mad55557777
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 23673

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 9:42 pm    Post subject:

Zillethai wrote:
Lakers are a mid level team.. along with the Warriors and Rockets and Suns.


Nuggets, Clippers, OKC, T Wolves, Mavs, Kings are all above them.

Lakers are not a bad team, so let’s throw that out of the window. Lakers are only great when Lebron is on, so it is hard to see this team going anywhere given lebron is 39 years old.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Kobetan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Sep 2020
Posts: 2967

PostPosted: Mon Dec 25, 2023 10:47 pm    Post subject:

Lakers have a very good ceiling, but unfortunately a very poor floor as well. Huge problem is they can't sustain their ceiling, and their bad floor play may not even squeeze them into the playoffs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BirdMagicLegend
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 345
Location: Boston, MA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 5:54 am    Post subject:

Hard_Butter wrote:
BirdMagicLegend wrote:
Woohoo!

Beat LA!!

It's always great Christmas present to beat the Lakers.


{profanity deleted by alpha}

But do have a Merry Christmas, you filthy animal.


Merry Christmas to you too.

I'm just enjoying my own QFTOS on this board since that is a topic that Lakersground love to do after every win. You don't see a QFTOS topic for Laker fans on the Celtics forums this morning.

Also what's with the cheering for the Celtics at the end of the game??? That was very surprising

I hope you realize that Laker fans sound just as bad or worse when they lose
and today was a loss. Enjoy your in season championship though.
_________________
"Larry, you only told me one lie. You said there will be another Larry Bird. Larry, there will never, ever be another Larry Bird." — Magic Johnson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Four Decade Bandwagon
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Posts: 8184

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 7:19 am    Post subject:

mad55557777 wrote:
Zillethai wrote:
Lakers are a mid level team.. along with the Warriors and Rockets and Suns.


Nuggets, Clippers, OKC, T Wolves, Mavs, Kings are all above them.

Lakers are not a bad team, so let’s throw that out of the window. Lakers are only great when Lebron is on, so it is hard to see this team going anywhere given lebron is 39 years old.


The Lebron issue is the elephant in the room though. Has been for the past few years. How do you balance the necessity to rely on a player that can’t be relied upon to play the mins or games to consistently win?

He has amazing moments. Just few amazing games.

I also question the “can’t be traded” premise. Why? Is he a top 10 player or not? Can he make a difference on a borderline team to get over the hump? He seems to struggle to do that with the Lakers. But maybe a fresh vibe changes that.

Of the list above the Warriors seem the most likely. Would they trade for one last run at a Championship? Would James agree if he was able to get to play with Paul and Curry? What would they give up? Would the Lakers want to include a headcase like Green into the deal?

How about a package starting with Wiggins, Looney, Kuminga? Or Thompson, Kuminga?

How about the Suns? Take advantage of their disgruntled lockerroom and try to get Booker?

I agree a James is a legend in the League. But not untouchable IMO. Just need the right situation to help both teams. Or we can just hope he can play 35+mpg for the season, trade for players “ that help him”, and remain healthy enough to make that 16 game playoff run one more time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TMG
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Jan 2019
Posts: 6970

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 7:42 am    Post subject:

Four Decade Bandwagon wrote:
mad55557777 wrote:
Zillethai wrote:
Lakers are a mid level team.. along with the Warriors and Rockets and Suns.


Nuggets, Clippers, OKC, T Wolves, Mavs, Kings are all above them.

Lakers are not a bad team, so let’s throw that out of the window. Lakers are only great when Lebron is on, so it is hard to see this team going anywhere given lebron is 39 years old.


The Lebron issue is the elephant in the room though. Has been for the past few years. How do you balance the necessity to rely on a player that can’t be relied upon to play the mins or games to consistently win?

He has amazing moments. Just few amazing games.

I also question the “can’t be traded” premise. Why? Is he a top 10 player or not? Can he make a difference on a borderline team to get over the hump? He seems to struggle to do that with the Lakers. But maybe a fresh vibe changes that.

Of the list above the Warriors seem the most likely. Would they trade for one last run at a Championship? Would James agree if he was able to get to play with Paul and Curry? What would they give up? Would the Lakers want to include a headcase like Green into the deal?

How about a package starting with Wiggins, Looney, Kuminga? Or Thompson, Kuminga?

How about the Suns? Take advantage of their disgruntled lockerroom and try to get Booker?

I agree a James is a legend in the League. But not untouchable IMO. Just need the right situation to help both teams. Or we can just hope he can play 35+mpg for the season, trade for players “ that help him”, and remain healthy enough to make that 16 game playoff run one more time.


You think we'll be able to get booker for a 40 year old Lebron really?

Lebron and AD ain't the issue. Matter of fact both of them have been pretty (bleep) great this season.

It's not Lebrons fault our guys cant hit wide open threes whilst other teams role players can.

Not Lebrons fault our guards are negatives on the defensive end.

Not Lebrons fault we've got borderline G-league players as backup bigs.

and that GSW trade is laughably bad. Really Wiggins-Looney

'Might as well blow it up and get some real value for both stars.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Four Decade Bandwagon
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Jul 2014
Posts: 8184

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2023 8:19 am    Post subject:

TMG wrote:
Four Decade Bandwagon wrote:
mad55557777 wrote:
Zillethai wrote:
Lakers are a mid level team.. along with the Warriors and Rockets and Suns.


Nuggets, Clippers, OKC, T Wolves, Mavs, Kings are all above them.

Lakers are not a bad team, so let’s throw that out of the window. Lakers are only great when Lebron is on, so it is hard to see this team going anywhere given lebron is 39 years old.


The Lebron issue is the elephant in the room though. Has been for the past few years. How do you balance the necessity to rely on a player that can’t be relied upon to play the mins or games to consistently win?

He has amazing moments. Just few amazing games.

I also question the “can’t be traded” premise. Why? Is he a top 10 player or not? Can he make a difference on a borderline team to get over the hump? He seems to struggle to do that with the Lakers. But maybe a fresh vibe changes that.

Of the list above the Warriors seem the most likely. Would they trade for one last run at a Championship? Would James agree if he was able to get to play with Paul and Curry? What would they give up? Would the Lakers want to include a headcase like Green into the deal?

How about a package starting with Wiggins, Looney, Kuminga? Or Thompson, Kuminga?

How about the Suns? Take advantage of their disgruntled lockerroom and try to get Booker?

I agree a James is a legend in the League. But not untouchable IMO. Just need the right situation to help both teams. Or we can just hope he can play 35+mpg for the season, trade for players “ that help him”, and remain healthy enough to make that 16 game playoff run one more time.


You think we'll be able to get booker for a 40 year old Lebron really?

Lebron and AD ain't the issue. Matter of fact both of them have been pretty (bleep) great this season.

It's not Lebrons fault our guys cant hit wide open threes whilst other teams role players can.

Not Lebrons fault our guards are negatives on the defensive end.

Not Lebrons fault we've got borderline G-league players as backup bigs.

and that GSW trade is laughably bad. Really Wiggins-Looney

'Might as well blow it up and get some real value for both stars.



Curious what “real value” means to you?

Davis would bring back a quality package. IMO he is the one you build around. His two way talent is worth more than any blow it up package.

So that leaves James. Keep him and continue down the same “hope for good health” and the annual roster shuffle at the trade deadline to get him the help he needs? Or does he have trade value?

As for my trade ideas, just spitballing for players that would help this Laker team for a few years. I’m guessing it will never happen. But even if it did it would likely be multi team and a bigger package than a couple core players I mentioned.

It goes to the question of “what is James worth in trade” Is he a top 10 player that helps a mid tier team compete or is he a legend that gives you some spectacular moments but not enough to win games consistently?

IMO the Lakers missed the opportunity to trade him a season ago. Now we are just another mid tier team that has hopes everything goes perfectly for a chance to compete. While the real contenders absorb the injuries and poor shooting nights but still win games. I remember those days and Laker teams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Game Updates All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 26, 27, 28  Next
Page 27 of 28
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB