What depressing was we had guys like Byron and Luke coaching those kids. Except from Ingram ( not sure may be wrong) all other youngster had problem with coaching staff.
Joined: 26 May 2016 Posts: 7825 Location: Long Beach
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:08 pm Post subject:
It's childish to me, what some of you do. There is no need to piss on any of our former or current players to prop up the achievements of others. It seems so juvenile. We're grown men in here, it seems like the sort of thing a teenager would do. This is what you see them doing on facebook.
I’m sure BI or Julius will put up 40/20 in a win hahaha.
Lock this thread up
BI Just had a 35 15 game at 22.. What are you talking about?
Not in 3 quarters, but still impressive.
That's not the point.. The sentiment communicated in the original post is that Ingram and Julez can't put up those numbers.
I'd argue it's only a matter of time for both. And no, that doesn't mean they'll ever be as good as AD. Just wanted to point out how silly the post was.
Actually the original sentiment was that they wouldn't do it in a win, it was also in response to people talking about AD's stats being empty...in which you replied with a statline of BI in a loss. Then you try to deflect that the 40/20 was in 30 minutes lol
You sir have strong reading comprehension skilllllzzzz. Ding ding
I’m sure BI or Julius will put up 40/20 in a win hahaha.
Lock this thread up
BI Just had a 35 15 game at 22.. What are you talking about?
Not in 3 quarters, but still impressive.
That's not the point.. The sentiment communicated in the original post is that Ingram and Julez can't put up those numbers.
I'd argue it's only a matter of time for both. And no, that doesn't mean they'll ever be as good as AD. Just wanted to point out how silly the post was.
Actually the original sentiment was that they wouldn't do it in a win, it was also in response to people talking about AD's stats being empty...in which you replied with a statline of BI in a loss. Then you try to deflect that the 40/20 was in 30 minutes lol
You sir have strong reading comprehension skilllllzzzz. Ding ding
Did you see Rocky 2 (I think it was 2).
At the end, Creed and Rocky are about to have a friendly spar.
And Creed says "ding... ding," to imitate the bell sound.
I want to read your statement in that way.
It would be classic
I’m sure BI or Julius will put up 40/20 in a win hahaha.
Lock this thread up
BI Just had a 35 15 game at 22.. What are you talking about?
Not in 3 quarters, but still impressive.
That's not the point.. The sentiment communicated in the original post is that Ingram and Julez can't put up those numbers.
I'd argue it's only a matter of time for both. And no, that doesn't mean they'll ever be as good as AD. Just wanted to point out how silly the post was.
Actually the original sentiment was that they wouldn't do it in a win, it was also in response to people talking about AD's stats being empty...in which you replied with a statline of BI in a loss. Then you try to deflect that the 40/20 was in 30 minutes lol
You sir have strong reading comprehension skilllllzzzz. Ding ding
Did you see Rocky 2 (I think it was 2).
At the end, Creed and Rocky are about to have a friendly spar.
And Creed says "ding... ding," to imitate the bell sound.
I want to read your statement in that way.
It would be classic
Remember. Creed puts on the mouthguard, then says it. So it has that funny mouthguard muffled sound. And it was Rocky 3. _________________ From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
I’m sure BI or Julius will put up 40/20 in a win hahaha.
Lock this thread up
BI Just had a 35 15 game at 22.. What are you talking about?
Not in 3 quarters, but still impressive.
That's not the point.. The sentiment communicated in the original post is that Ingram and Julez can't put up those numbers.
I'd argue it's only a matter of time for both. And no, that doesn't mean they'll ever be as good as AD. Just wanted to point out how silly the post was.
Actually the original sentiment was that they wouldn't do it in a win, it was also in response to people talking about AD's stats being empty...in which you replied with a statline of BI in a loss. Then you try to deflect that the 40/20 was in 30 minutes lol
You sir have strong reading comprehension skilllllzzzz. Ding ding
Did you see Rocky 2 (I think it was 2).
At the end, Creed and Rocky are about to have a friendly spar.
And Creed says "ding... ding," to imitate the bell sound.
I want to read your statement in that way.
It would be classic
Remember. Creed puts on the mouthguard, then says it. So it has that funny mouthguard muffled sound. And it was Rocky 3.
I’m sure BI or Julius will put up 40/20 in a win hahaha.
Lock this thread up
BI Just had a 35 15 game at 22.. What are you talking about?
Not in 3 quarters, but still impressive.
That's not the point.. The sentiment communicated in the original post is that Ingram and Julez can't put up those numbers.
I'd argue it's only a matter of time for both. And no, that doesn't mean they'll ever be as good as AD. Just wanted to point out how silly the post was.
Actually the original sentiment was that they wouldn't do it in a win, it was also in response to people talking about AD's stats being empty...in which you replied with a statline of BI in a loss. Then you try to deflect that the 40/20 was in 30 minutes lol
You sir have strong reading comprehension skilllllzzzz. Ding ding
Did you see Rocky 2 (I think it was 2).
At the end, Creed and Rocky are about to have a friendly spar.
And Creed says "ding... ding," to imitate the bell sound.
I want to read your statement in that way.
It would be classic
Haha when I write or text ding ding. I think of that seen toooooo!!!!!
I still want to see Svi, Zubac, Randle, BI, Hart and Lonzo do well...except when they are play us...we had two real routes to go keep folks and build that young team up or use them as assets...I don't think either is right or wrong...our approach has put AD and LeBron on our team so that's nothing to complain about and those guys play hard when they were here on this team, hope they do well and reach their potential
It's childish to me, what some of you do. There is no need to piss on any of our former or current players to prop up the achievements of others. It seems so juvenile. We're grown men in here, it seems like the sort of thing a teenager would do. This is what you see them doing on facebook.
It’s toxic IMO. FB aswell. I think in a podcast maybe Pete and Anthony but I herd Ingram’s plus minus wasn’t great. I thought BI had the most talent but maybe he wasn’t the best fit overall. What do you think about plus and minuses?
Good move. Was tired of seeing this thread. Soon I won't even remember the names of our castaways after we celebrated multiple championships. _________________ Playoffs is good enough. - Jeanie Buss 2024
If only we could have kept Lonzo.
If he could maintain his 36% 3pt% and 75% FT%, his defense at the lead guard spot would be amazing. And it would take pressure off of LeBron having to dribble up the court so much.
If only we could have kept Lonzo.
If he could maintain his 36% 3pt% and 75% FT%, his defense at the lead guard spot would be amazing. And it would take pressure off of LeBron having to dribble up the court so much.
Joined: 10 Jul 2009 Posts: 12212 Location: Bay Area
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 12:25 pm Post subject:
Randle driving that struggle bus right now. 5 assists to 4.6 turnovers a game? woof. virtually no defensive presence. bleh shooting. Welcome to the Knicks, Jules. Get that paper, because that's all you'll ever get at this rate...
Joined: 10 Apr 2001 Posts: 65135 Location: Orange County, CA
Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:09 pm Post subject:
Cutheon wrote:
Randle driving that struggle bus right now. 5 assists to 4.6 turnovers a game? woof. virtually no defensive presence. bleh shooting. Welcome to the Knicks, Jules. Get that paper, because that's all you'll ever get at this rate...
1:1 A/TO is the running average for a frontcourt player. _________________ Resident Car Nut.
Randle driving that struggle bus right now. 5 assists to 4.6 turnovers a game? woof. virtually no defensive presence. bleh shooting. Welcome to the Knicks, Jules. Get that paper, because that's all you'll ever get at this rate...
1:1 A/TO is the running average for a frontcourt player.
Joined: 10 Apr 2001 Posts: 65135 Location: Orange County, CA
Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2019 11:28 am Post subject:
jonnybravo wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
Cutheon wrote:
Randle driving that struggle bus right now. 5 assists to 4.6 turnovers a game? woof. virtually no defensive presence. bleh shooting. Welcome to the Knicks, Jules. Get that paper, because that's all you'll ever get at this rate...
1:1 A/TO is the running average for a frontcourt player.
Not one with 5+ assists.
Hence, running average for that position. _________________ Resident Car Nut.
It gives a reason to watch the Pelicans. They get a chance to develop without a lot of pressure. We will see how they respond. One thing is for sure, I'm going to be watching a hell of a lot more Pelican games than I ever have before.
Randle driving that struggle bus right now. 5 assists to 4.6 turnovers a game? woof. virtually no defensive presence. bleh shooting. Welcome to the Knicks, Jules. Get that paper, because that's all you'll ever get at this rate...
1:1 A/TO is the running average for a frontcourt player.
Not one with 5+ assists.
Hence, running average for that position.
Right but I should have further explained my point. If a big is averaging high assists, it should mean he's good enough of a playmaker to be put in that position. All the high assists bigs have better than that ratio...most are significantly better. If you're a big averaging high assist with that ratio, you probably shouldn't be playmaking anywhere near that frequency. _________________ KOBE
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum