**OFFICIAL** 2018 Fantasy Foootball Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 23, 24, 25  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 7:55 pm    Post subject:

Freddie Buckets wrote:
vanexelent wrote:
BadGuy wrote:
Freddie Buckets wrote:
Question for tonight.

George Kittle or OJ Howard? PPR

Looks like CJ Bethard may sit tonight and the 49ers will start some dude named Nick Mullens.


Howard


Oops


haha luckily i went with kittle tonight


Even better!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BadGuy
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 3629

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:44 am    Post subject:

vanexelent wrote:
BadGuy wrote:
Freddie Buckets wrote:
Question for tonight.

George Kittle or OJ Howard? PPR

Looks like CJ Bethard may sit tonight and the 49ers will start some dude named Nick Mullens.


Howard


Oops


Given the information before the game, I'd go Howard again. If you're expecting psychic advice, sorry to disappoint
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BadGuy
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 3629

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 2:46 am    Post subject:

Freddie Buckets wrote:
vanexelent wrote:
BadGuy wrote:
Freddie Buckets wrote:
Question for tonight.

George Kittle or OJ Howard? PPR

Looks like CJ Bethard may sit tonight and the 49ers will start some dude named Nick Mullens.


Howard


Oops


haha luckily i went with kittle tonight


Nice job sticking with your gut and not coming back and blaming us for who you started
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 6:11 am    Post subject:

Who would have thought Nick Mullens would have a game like that. Wow. I mean, sure, it's the Raiders, but damn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
vanexelent
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 30081

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:07 am    Post subject:

BadGuy wrote:
Freddie Buckets wrote:
vanexelent wrote:
BadGuy wrote:
Freddie Buckets wrote:
Question for tonight.

George Kittle or OJ Howard? PPR

Looks like CJ Bethard may sit tonight and the 49ers will start some dude named Nick Mullens.


Howard


Oops


haha luckily i went with kittle tonight


Nice job sticking with your gut and not coming back and blaming us for who you started


I have Godwin, so I'm hoping Fitzpatrick's return helps boost him again too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:41 pm    Post subject:

I just picked up Valdes-Scantling in two of my three leagues. Allison is doubtful for Sunday, and if MVS is an every-snap player, he's in a beautiful spot on Sunday night against the Patriots, especially with Gilmore shadowing Adams. Adams can still get his, but MVS should produce if he's out on the field for nearly every play in what should be a shootout.

In the same yahoo league, I now have all of Courtland Sutton, DJ Moore, and MVS, in addition to my usual starters Mike Evans and Emmanuel Sanders. I also have Doug Baldwin (a guy I've benched for now) and Danny Amendola as PPR insurance. I'm going to have to bench one of Sutton/Moore/MVS this week and I'm not sure which one to bench! I think I have to play MVS so it'll probably come down to Sutton or Moore for me.

In another league, I have Adams, Golladay, John Brown, D-Jax, and MVS (with Hilton on the bye). Of those first 5 options, I need to play 4. As this is the league where I have Fitzpatrick, I'm going to also play D-Jax. So it basically comes down to Golladay/Brown/MVS for 2 spots. Some don't like starting 2 WR's on the same team, but I don't care about that. I think Golladay is going to get a target spike and he's due for a good game. Brown has started to be a little boom-or-bust and the Steelers have stiffened up defensively lately, though Brown did go for over 110 yards and a TD the last time they played.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
vanexelent
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 30081

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:18 pm    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
I just picked up Valdes-Scantling in two of my three leagues. Allison is doubtful for Sunday, and if MVS is an every-snap player, he's in a beautiful spot on Sunday night against the Patriots, especially with Gilmore shadowing Adams. Adams can still get his, but MVS should produce if he's out on the field for nearly every play in what should be a shootout.

In the same yahoo league, I now have all of Courtland Sutton, DJ Moore, and MVS, in addition to my usual starters Mike Evans and Emmanuel Sanders. I also have Doug Baldwin (a guy I've benched for now) and Danny Amendola as PPR insurance. I'm going to have to bench one of Sutton/Moore/MVS this week and I'm not sure which one to bench! I think I have to play MVS so it'll probably come down to Sutton or Moore for me.

In another league, I have Adams, Golladay, John Brown, D-Jax, and MVS (with Hilton on the bye). Of those first 5 options, I need to play 4. As this is the league where I have Fitzpatrick, I'm going to also play D-Jax. So it basically comes down to Golladay/Brown/MVS for 2 spots. Some don't like starting 2 WR's on the same team, but I don't care about that. I think Golladay is going to get a target spike and he's due for a good game. Brown has started to be a little boom-or-bust and the Steelers have stiffened up defensively lately, though Brown did go for over 110 yards and a TD the last time they played.


You must have a very good RB core.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 10:24 pm    Post subject:

vanexelent wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
I just picked up Valdes-Scantling in two of my three leagues. Allison is doubtful for Sunday, and if MVS is an every-snap player, he's in a beautiful spot on Sunday night against the Patriots, especially with Gilmore shadowing Adams. Adams can still get his, but MVS should produce if he's out on the field for nearly every play in what should be a shootout.

In the same yahoo league, I now have all of Courtland Sutton, DJ Moore, and MVS, in addition to my usual starters Mike Evans and Emmanuel Sanders. I also have Doug Baldwin (a guy I've benched for now) and Danny Amendola as PPR insurance. I'm going to have to bench one of Sutton/Moore/MVS this week and I'm not sure which one to bench! I think I have to play MVS so it'll probably come down to Sutton or Moore for me.

In another league, I have Adams, Golladay, John Brown, D-Jax, and MVS (with Hilton on the bye). Of those first 5 options, I need to play 4. As this is the league where I have Fitzpatrick, I'm going to also play D-Jax. So it basically comes down to Golladay/Brown/MVS for 2 spots. Some don't like starting 2 WR's on the same team, but I don't care about that. I think Golladay is going to get a target spike and he's due for a good game. Brown has started to be a little boom-or-bust and the Steelers have stiffened up defensively lately, though Brown did go for over 110 yards and a TD the last time they played.


You must have a very good RB core.


I did get Gurley with the #1 pick in one of those leagues, and in the other I have Hunt, Mack, and Chubb.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Huskers
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 28 Jun 2011
Posts: 481
Location: Nebraska

PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2018 11:33 am    Post subject:

General question, how active are your leagues in terms of trades? The leagues I'm in, trades are almost non-existent. I've got some top tier talent that I can't use, and no one will even engage in trade discussions for them. Any way to emphasis or encourage trades in a league in those that are active with them?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2018 1:46 pm    Post subject:

Huskers wrote:
General question, how active are your leagues in terms of trades? The leagues I'm in, trades are almost non-existent. I've got some top tier talent that I can't use, and no one will even engage in trade discussions for them. Any way to emphasis or encourage trades in a league in those that are active with them?


I think it's like that in many leagues for sure. I think if you've been in the same league for a long time with the same owners, it might be a little bit easier. If it's a league where you don't actually know the other owners all too well outside of fantasy football, maybe post a message on a message board on the league website? Just anything to get it out there that you're open for business. Of course, you can blindly just send an owner a trade proposal, but I prefer to break the ice first by either texting them or at least putting something out there first.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lonzo'sBalls
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 07 Sep 2017
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2018 3:42 pm    Post subject:

Ya I've been in leagues like that, don't think it'll work for you huskers.

What my buddy does is just sends everyone in the league like 50 trade proposals lol.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
HOF Rookie
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Posts: 1717

PostPosted: Mon Nov 05, 2018 9:29 pm    Post subject:

Huskers wrote:
General question, how active are your leagues in terms of trades? The leagues I'm in, trades are almost non-existent. I've got some top tier talent that I can't use, and no one will even engage in trade discussions for them. Any way to emphasis or encourage trades in a league in those that are active with them?


in the leagues i've been in, there's usually about 3 or 4 trades league wide for the season.

i'd like it to be more active, but i think people are generally afraid to make a wrong move.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 4:28 am    Post subject:

Fantasy-relevant observations after Week 9...

--Teams are just relentlessly attacking Marcus Peters with their best outside WR. With Seattle coming to LA for Week 10 and since Seattle is likely to have to throw a bit more than they would like to (kind of like last week), this could mean good things for Tyler Lockett. I might have to play him in DFS, and coming off a slow game, I think he could be low-owned.

--I know it's a division game, but the Raiders look so putrid that there's a very real chance that the Chargers blow them out in Week 10. If so, I'm guessing the Chargers take the opportunity to get Austin Ekeler even more work than normal, given that Melvin Gordon had a recent hamstring injury. Just something to keep in mind when considering lineup decisions. The Chargers are 10-point favorites in Oakland.

--Sticking with the Chargers, I'll just throw out Mike Badgley's name if you're streaming kickers and looking for great matchups. The kid was 10-for-10 on his kicks earlier in the season and is worth a shot unless you have one of the top kickers.

--Dion Lewis has clearly asserted himself as the feature back for the Titans, and is now well ahead of Derrick Henry (a major miss of mine during draft season). He should be highly-motivated to face the Patriots in Week 10.

--I talked him up recently and I'll do it again: Marquez Valdes-Scantling keeps making plays, and with Geronimo Allison on the shelf now, he needs to be in lineups going forward.

--The Lions offense looked awful in its first week without Golden Tate. It was like Stafford had no idea what to do, and Minnesota hasn't exactly looked like a fearsome defense this season. At least, not until Sunday. It's a major worry for their rest-of-season outlook if you own guys like Stafford, Golladay, and Marvin Jones, and Detroit's schedule is not kind for the rest of the season. It's less of a concern for Kerryon Johnson, but it's still not ideal to own running backs in poor offenses.

--Dalvin Cook showed his speed on a long run on Sunday and looked healthy, and could be a major difference-maker down the stretch for the Vikes. With Minnesota on bye in Week 10, this could be a last chance to swing a trade for him, and for those teams that look playoff-bound, it doesn't hurt to try to swing a deal. Perhaps if you're overloaded at WR and could use a RB with upside, and if the Cook owner needs a win and is hurting at WR, you could pull something off.

--A word of advice for Kareem Hunt and Todd Gurley owners: now is the time to handcuff. So Hunt owners, you need to add Spencer Ware, who would have a nearly every-down role on a video game offense if something happened to Hunt. The same goes true for Todd Gurley owners, with Malcolm Brown. Seriously, you will be kicking yourselves if you don't do this and if there is an injury. Ware and Brown might not be superstar RB1's but they will still be clear RB1's. This is the time of year where handcuffing needs to happen, and it doesn't really apply to any other RB1's this year, because guys like Mark Ingram and Austin Ekeler are already on virtually every roster, as is Le'Veon Bell.

--Speaking of Le'Veon, I'm sorry, but I just don't see how the Steelers turn away from James Conner. Not only has he outplayed Le'Veon, but how would it look in the locker room if they just re-installed Bell as the guy? I simply don't think they will do that.

--I actually think it's going to hurt Tyler Boyd that A.J. Green is going to miss a couple of games, at the very least. It's not like Boyd was struggling for target volume anyway, and now he's going to have the opposing team's #1 CB chasing him for however long Green is out. We kind of saw something similar happen with Adam Thielen on Sunday, as Diggs' injury opened the door for Darius Slay to travel to Thielen far more often, and he finally had a dud of a game (though he still managed a TD). I think it goes without saying that Andy Dalton takes a hit here, too. Even in a great matchup against the Saints this week, I'm hedging my Dalton bets.

--Well, I'll say this for interim Browns OC Freddie Kitchens: he understood that Duke Johnson is really good at catching passes and doing something with them. He could still be available in many leagues, and especially in PPR leagues, he needs to be owned everywhere. Particularly since in Week 10, the Browns host the Falcons, and no team gives up more catches and receiving yards to running backs than the Falcons do. Sometimes there can be 1-game mirages in the NFL, but this is something that should've been happening all year, as Johnson is great with the ball in space, and it's a cheap way to get Baker Mayfield going. I think we'll see more of this going forward, and it's also worth noting that Nick Chubb is still going to see about 20 carries a game and is a very worthy RB2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersChamps04
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 3737

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 5:44 am    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
Fantasy-relevant observations after Week 9...

--Teams are just relentlessly attacking Marcus Peters with their best outside WR. With Seattle coming to LA for Week 10 and since Seattle is likely to have to throw a bit more than they would like to (kind of like last week), this could mean good things for Tyler Lockett. I might have to play him in DFS, and coming off a slow game, I think he could be low-owned.

--I know it's a division game, but the Raiders look so putrid that there's a very real chance that the Chargers blow them out in Week 10. If so, I'm guessing the Chargers take the opportunity to get Austin Ekeler even more work than normal, given that Melvin Gordon had a recent hamstring injury. Just something to keep in mind when considering lineup decisions. The Chargers are 10-point favorites in Oakland.

--Sticking with the Chargers, I'll just throw out Mike Badgley's name if you're streaming kickers and looking for great matchups. The kid was 10-for-10 on his kicks earlier in the season and is worth a shot unless you have one of the top kickers.

--Dion Lewis has clearly asserted himself as the feature back for the Titans, and is now well ahead of Derrick Henry (a major miss of mine during draft season). He should be highly-motivated to face the Patriots in Week 10.

--I talked him up recently and I'll do it again: Marquez Valdes-Scantling keeps making plays, and with Geronimo Allison on the shelf now, he needs to be in lineups going forward.

--The Lions offense looked awful in its first week without Golden Tate. It was like Stafford had no idea what to do, and Minnesota hasn't exactly looked like a fearsome defense this season. At least, not until Sunday. It's a major worry for their rest-of-season outlook if you own guys like Stafford, Golladay, and Marvin Jones, and Detroit's schedule is not kind for the rest of the season. It's less of a concern for Kerryon Johnson, but it's still not ideal to own running backs in poor offenses.

--Dalvin Cook showed his speed on a long run on Sunday and looked healthy, and could be a major difference-maker down the stretch for the Vikes. With Minnesota on bye in Week 10, this could be a last chance to swing a trade for him, and for those teams that look playoff-bound, it doesn't hurt to try to swing a deal. Perhaps if you're overloaded at WR and could use a RB with upside, and if the Cook owner needs a win and is hurting at WR, you could pull something off.

--A word of advice for Kareem Hunt and Todd Gurley owners: now is the time to handcuff. So Hunt owners, you need to add Spencer Ware, who would have a nearly every-down role on a video game offense if something happened to Hunt. The same goes true for Todd Gurley owners, with Malcolm Brown. Seriously, you will be kicking yourselves if you don't do this and if there is an injury. Ware and Brown might not be superstar RB1's but they will still be clear RB1's. This is the time of year where handcuffing needs to happen, and it doesn't really apply to any other RB1's this year, because guys like Mark Ingram and Austin Ekeler are already on virtually every roster, as is Le'Veon Bell.

--Speaking of Le'Veon, I'm sorry, but I just don't see how the Steelers turn away from James Conner. Not only has he outplayed Le'Veon, but how would it look in the locker room if they just re-installed Bell as the guy? I simply don't think they will do that.

--I actually think it's going to hurt Tyler Boyd that A.J. Green is going to miss a couple of games, at the very least. It's not like Boyd was struggling for target volume anyway, and now he's going to have the opposing team's #1 CB chasing him for however long Green is out. We kind of saw something similar happen with Adam Thielen on Sunday, as Diggs' injury opened the door for Darius Slay to travel to Thielen far more often, and he finally had a dud of a game (though he still managed a TD). I think it goes without saying that Andy Dalton takes a hit here, too. Even in a great matchup against the Saints this week, I'm hedging my Dalton bets.

--Well, I'll say this for interim Browns OC Freddie Kitchens: he understood that Duke Johnson is really good at catching passes and doing something with them. He could still be available in many leagues, and especially in PPR leagues, he needs to be owned everywhere. Particularly since in Week 10, the Browns host the Falcons, and no team gives up more catches and receiving yards to running backs than the Falcons do. Sometimes there can be 1-game mirages in the NFL, but this is something that should've been happening all year, as Johnson is great with the ball in space, and it's a cheap way to get Baker Mayfield going. I think we'll see more of this going forward, and it's also worth noting that Nick Chubb is still going to see about 20 carries a game and is a very worthy RB2.
Always enjoy your takes Stu. Good things to keep in mind. I've had Ekeler on my team to handcuff Gordon, but I wasn't impressed the 1 game Gordon missed and Ekeler was the guy. Might drop him for Ware unless I can make room to have them both on there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lonzo'sBalls
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 07 Sep 2017
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:11 am    Post subject:

Man Stu your point about Peters is so right. Teams are just going at him, and why not? He was absolutely cooked Sunday with no regard for human life by Michael Thomas.

Agreed on the Bell front, he might as well just sit out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 2:54 pm    Post subject:

LakersChamps04, if you can find a way to add Ware (do you have Hunt?) while keeping Ekeler, I'd advise that you do it. I don't know how shallow your league is or who you have on your bench, though. In general, though, Ekeler needs to be owned everywhere. In the game Gordon missed, Ekeler received 17 touches. He didn't have a great game, but Tennessee limits RB output. (Zeke struggled as a rusher against them last night, for example.)

Lonzo'sBalls, I think Bell is going to report now because he wants that accrued year towards free agency, plus, as I said, I think the team is going to stick with Conner and I think he knows that. So why not come back now, make a few million instead of losing your entire salary, and hardly play, if at all?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lonzo'sBalls
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 07 Sep 2017
Posts: 423

PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2018 3:17 pm    Post subject:

Really good point Stu, I didn't factor in the contact status aspect of it. Oh and I picked up Badgley on the sly Sunday morning thanks for the reinforcement
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:41 am    Post subject:

Dez Bryant just signed with the Saints, and no, you should not pick him up except in the deepest of leagues!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
vanexelent
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 30081

PostPosted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:55 pm    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
Dez Bryant just signed with the Saints, and no, you should not pick him up except in the deepest of leagues!


Ha. I scooped him in a league I'm pretty stacked, just for fun. I actually think he has some shots at Red Zone targets. Brees has been looking to Hill and Watson a lot lately and that Smith kid hasn't been doing much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 11:22 pm    Post subject:

If you happen to have an open roster spot, and if you have been streaming QB's (either in a typical 1-QB league or for a 2-QB league where perhaps your 2nd starting QB has been a guy like Case Keenum or even Joe Flacco), it might be worth adding Lamar Jackson. The Ravens are on bye this week and a report came out that Flacco is dealing with a hip injury and that he could miss time. Who knows if this is just a convenient excuse to start Jackson or if it's a legit injury, and maybe Flacco does play through it. But if Jackson gets the nod next week against the Bengals, he will warrant immediate low-end QB1 consideration because his rush floor will be so high. And the Ravens' schedule for the rest of the season couldn't be much better, in terms of facing bad defenses. Starting next week, they play Cincy (29th in PPG to fantasy QB's), Oakland (23rd), at Atlanta (30th), at KC (26th), Tampa Bay (32nd), and at the Chargers (21st).

If you have the space, I'd pick him up. He's a potential lottery ticket that has a real chance to start next week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AY2043
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 10621

PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 11:49 pm    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
If you happen to have an open roster spot, and if you have been streaming QB's (either in a typical 1-QB league or for a 2-QB league where perhaps your 2nd starting QB has been a guy like Case Keenum or even Joe Flacco), it might be worth adding Lamar Jackson. The Ravens are on bye this week and a report came out that Flacco is dealing with a hip injury and that he could miss time. Who knows if this is just a convenient excuse to start Jackson or if it's a legit injury, and maybe Flacco does play through it. But if Jackson gets the nod next week against the Bengals, he will warrant immediate low-end QB1 consideration because his rush floor will be so high. And the Ravens' schedule for the rest of the season couldn't be much better, in terms of facing bad defenses. Starting next week, they play Cincy (29th in PPG to fantasy QB's), Oakland (23rd), at Atlanta (30th), at KC (26th), Tampa Bay (32nd), and at the Chargers (21st).

If you have the space, I'd pick him up. He's a potential lottery ticket that has a real chance to start next week.

Thanks for the heads up. I’ve had my eye on Jackson for a while, but didn’t know about Flacco’s injury. That was the final straw.

My work league is 10 team 2QB, and a few teams are hoarding QB’s. I was the Jimmy G owner and wasn’t carrying a backup at the time, so I’ve had to resort to starting Rosen as my QB2 most of the year. I was fortunate enough to pick up Fitzmagic before last week, but I feel like he could get benched again any second. Lamar seems like a worthwhile lotto ticket in my situation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31922
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2018 3:33 am    Post subject:

AY2043 wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
If you happen to have an open roster spot, and if you have been streaming QB's (either in a typical 1-QB league or for a 2-QB league where perhaps your 2nd starting QB has been a guy like Case Keenum or even Joe Flacco), it might be worth adding Lamar Jackson. The Ravens are on bye this week and a report came out that Flacco is dealing with a hip injury and that he could miss time. Who knows if this is just a convenient excuse to start Jackson or if it's a legit injury, and maybe Flacco does play through it. But if Jackson gets the nod next week against the Bengals, he will warrant immediate low-end QB1 consideration because his rush floor will be so high. And the Ravens' schedule for the rest of the season couldn't be much better, in terms of facing bad defenses. Starting next week, they play Cincy (29th in PPG to fantasy QB's), Oakland (23rd), at Atlanta (30th), at KC (26th), Tampa Bay (32nd), and at the Chargers (21st).

If you have the space, I'd pick him up. He's a potential lottery ticket that has a real chance to start next week.

Thanks for the heads up. I’ve had my eye on Jackson for a while, but didn’t know about Flacco’s injury. That was the final straw.

My work league is 10 team 2QB, and a few teams are hoarding QB’s. I was the Jimmy G owner and wasn’t carrying a backup at the time, so I’ve had to resort to starting Rosen as my QB2 most of the year. I was fortunate enough to pick up Fitzmagic before last week, but I feel like he could get benched again any second. Lamar seems like a worthwhile lotto ticket in my situation.


Yes, definitely. I'm in an 8-team, 2-QB league where I had Rodgers, Stafford, and Dalton before last week. That was the league where I traded Drake for Fitzpatrick (who was the first waiver claim of the week by the last place owner), and I ended up dropping Stafford in waiver claims last week (you're not allowed to carry more than 3 QB's unless you have an injured QB AND another QB that you have is on their bye week). So I have Rodgers, Fitzpatrick, and Dalton right now. I've been wondering all night long if I should pick up Jackson. As long as Fitzpatrick plays, I'll start him. But they could go back to Winston at some point, and the Bucs' next 3 games are going to tell the tale of their season. At 3-5, they have 3 winnable games in a row: at home against the Redskins, at the Giants, and at home against the 49ers. As far as Dalton is concerned, he has a safe-enough floor, but I'm worried about whatever upside he may have had now that the team is without A.J. Green. So part of me wants to drop Dalton for Jackson. Another part of me wants to drop Dalton for Winston, who is also available, with the thought of just simply guaranteeing myself the Tampa Bay QB situation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BadGuy
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 May 2008
Posts: 3629

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2018 4:39 am    Post subject:

Would it be wrong to bench my starters against future opponents to eliminate another team from playoff contention (obviously, I'll check to make sure this won't backfire, but I have a big points/record lead currently). The reason I am considering this is because that team colluded with the 1-8 last place team (both in my division) to get Kareem Hunt for Duke Johnson before the trade deadline. What do you guys think? This is an amateur work league that I will be quitting at the end of the year (my first in this league) because of the previous collusion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
HOF Rookie
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Posts: 1717

PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:30 am    Post subject:

BadGuy wrote:
Would it be wrong to bench my starters against future opponents to eliminate another team from playoff contention (obviously, I'll check to make sure this won't backfire, but I have a big points/record lead currently). The reason I am considering this is because that team colluded with the 1-8 last place team (both in my division) to get Kareem Hunt for Duke Johnson before the trade deadline. What do you guys think? This is an amateur work league that I will be quitting at the end of the year (my first in this league) because of the previous collusion.


I’d do it to F with them.

But also if it’s a work league and you’re playing with people you work closely with, just make sure it’s worth.

This is one reason I don’t play in a work league anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AY2043
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 10621

PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2018 12:56 pm    Post subject:

Looks like James Conner's going to play after his concussion last week, but I picked up his backup Jaylen Samuels in a couple leagues just in case. He has TE eligibility in Yahoo and CBS.

Might be worth an add if you have the roster spot available. Could be a week winner if Conner sits and you get starting RB level production from your TE spot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 23, 24, 25  Next
Page 18 of 25
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB