OFFICIAL GENERAL FREE AGENCY/TRADE THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5645, 5646, 5647 ... 8558, 8559, 8560  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ocho
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 53796

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 12:36 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
ocho wrote:
RashardA wrote:
Lonzo really is a complete bust for where he was drafted.

He's a role player taken at a position of the draft where you should be drafting a franchise player.

He also doesnt have the heart or desire for the game and its evident when he plays.

I honestly dont see Lonzo having a very long career and it has nothing to do with his ability.

I dont even think he enjoys playing the game at all.

He would prefer to rap.


Franchise players don't grow on trees, even in the lottery. We should know. We were in the lottery for 4 years in a row, including three #2 picks. Depending on how you look at Ingram, we maybe got one franchise player in the group and we are a team that drafts very well. There are a lot of variables that go into it, but fans tend to expect a star if they're picking high. Just doesn't work out that way.


All of our top draft picks, except Lonzo thus far have proven themselves to be All-Star quality(Randle, Russell) and potential franchise quality(Ingram) so that's pretty good on the scouting department.

And far as Lonzo goes his health is going to be a big factor in what he becomes and develops into, ultimately.


That's my whole point. All those guys are good! Some have made All Star teams. Are any of them franchise players in the traditional sense? I don't know if Ingram is going to lead you to a championship, but he keeps improving. Getting franchise players is really, really hard. Even with high lottery picks.
_________________
14-5-3-12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nash Vegas
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 7239

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 12:56 pm    Post subject:

Lonzo was Magic’s pick.

Randle, Dlo, Ingram were Mitch’s picks.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Laker4lifer4real
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jul 2017
Posts: 3483

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 12:59 pm    Post subject:

Tatum or Mitchell should have been the pick over Lonzo. I will say that the Lakers were clicking and then Lonzo rolled his ankle. That was it for the Playoffs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Laker4lifer4real
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jul 2017
Posts: 3483

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:00 pm    Post subject:

Tatum or Mitchell should have been the pick over Lonzo. I will say that the Lakers were clicking and then Lonzo rolled his ankle. That was it for the Playoffs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:02 pm    Post subject:

AFireInside619 wrote:
PASTOR RILEY wrote:
Release McKinney and get Kevin porter jr.


We are hard capped. Not sure if we could do that. Plus he’s a young prospect, I’m sure someone like the Knicks may trade for him.

He can be added on a 2-way. Unlikely to happen.
_________________
Under New Management
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
D-Shiznit
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Feb 2014
Posts: 1735

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:14 pm    Post subject:

Baron Von Humongous wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
PASTOR RILEY wrote:
Release McKinney and get Kevin porter jr.


We are hard capped. Not sure if we could do that. Plus he’s a young prospect, I’m sure someone like the Knicks may trade for him.

He can be added on a 2-way. Unlikely to happen.


Is a trade involving McKinney for him possible? Salary wise etc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
King Randle
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 7313

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:18 pm    Post subject:

Nash Vegas wrote:
Lonzo was Magic’s pick.

Randle, Dlo, Ingram were Mitch’s picks.


Magic screwed up the worst...Mitch/Jim actually did good here....they missed on DLO's year by passing on Booker and possibly Porz. Randle's year they could have had LaVine. But easy to judge now...that's why I'm saying they did well...Magic inexcusable by not taking Tatum, Fox or Mitchell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dcarter4kobe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 17674

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:21 pm    Post subject:

King Randle wrote:
Nash Vegas wrote:
Lonzo was Magic’s pick.

Randle, Dlo, Ingram were Mitch’s picks.


Magic screwed up the worst...Mitch/Jim actually did good here....they missed on DLO's year by passing on Booker and possibly Porz. Randle's year they could have had LaVine. But easy to judge now...that's why I'm saying they did well...Magic inexcusable by not taking Tatum, Fox or Mitchell

Mitchell was never in the discussion. It was basically Jackson/Tatum/Fox or Ball.
_________________
"He's a Zen master, so he can speak to you, and he doesn't need a microphone; you can hear him in your head, 'Ron, don't shoot, don't shoot.' Whatever, pow, three. I love the Zen, though."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:25 pm    Post subject:

D-Shiznit wrote:
Baron Von Humongous wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
PASTOR RILEY wrote:
Release McKinney and get Kevin porter jr.


We are hard capped. Not sure if we could do that. Plus he’s a young prospect, I’m sure someone like the Knicks may trade for him.

He can be added on a 2-way. Unlikely to happen.


Is a trade involving McKinney for him possible? Salary wise etc

Looks like it, yes.
_________________
Under New Management
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 1:26 pm    Post subject:

dcarter4kobe wrote:
King Randle wrote:
Nash Vegas wrote:
Lonzo was Magic’s pick.

Randle, Dlo, Ingram were Mitch’s picks.


Magic screwed up the worst...Mitch/Jim actually did good here....they missed on DLO's year by passing on Booker and possibly Porz. Randle's year they could have had LaVine. But easy to judge now...that's why I'm saying they did well...Magic inexcusable by not taking Tatum, Fox or Mitchell

Mitchell was never in the discussion. It was basically Jackson/Tatum/Fox or Ball.

And Booker was never in the discussion. Most here wanted Okafor or Mudiay if it wasn't DLo with Porzingis and Hezonja as dark horses.
_________________
Under New Management
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
King Randle
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Jul 2014
Posts: 7313

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 2:01 pm    Post subject:

Baron Von Humongous wrote:
dcarter4kobe wrote:
King Randle wrote:
Nash Vegas wrote:
Lonzo was Magic’s pick.

Randle, Dlo, Ingram were Mitch’s picks.


Magic screwed up the worst...Mitch/Jim actually did good here....they missed on DLO's year by passing on Booker and possibly Porz. Randle's year they could have had LaVine. But easy to judge now...that's why I'm saying they did well...Magic inexcusable by not taking Tatum, Fox or Mitchell

Mitchell was never in the discussion. It was basically Jackson/Tatum/Fox or Ball.

And Booker was never in the discussion. Most here wanted Okafor or Mudiay if it wasn't DLo with Porzingis and Hezonja as dark horses.


Yup...that's why I'm saying they did a good job.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PayasoLoco
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2001
Posts: 16663

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 2:12 pm    Post subject:

King Randle wrote:
Nash Vegas wrote:
Lonzo was Magic’s pick.

Randle, Dlo, Ingram were Mitch’s picks.


Magic screwed up the worst...Mitch/Jim actually did good here....they missed on DLO's year by passing on Booker and possibly Porz. Randle's year they could have had LaVine. But easy to judge now...that's why I'm saying they did well...Magic inexcusable by not taking Tatum, Fox or Mitchell

There was ONE POSTER who randles year said we should draft jokic. forgot who it was
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 2:16 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Randle, Ingram, Kuzma, Clarkson. Lopez were all ahead of Lonzo in the scoring pecking order.


Eh. When you aren't willing to attack, you are going to be low on the scoring pecking order. We are way past the point at which the excuses for Lonzo's offense became hollow. It wasn't that long ago that people were saying that Lonzo would be the next Jason Kidd. Instead, he's pretty much the same player he was as a rookie.
_________________
Internet Argument Resolved
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26309

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 2:17 pm    Post subject:

ocho wrote:
MJST wrote:
ocho wrote:
RashardA wrote:
Lonzo really is a complete bust for where he was drafted.

He's a role player taken at a position of the draft where you should be drafting a franchise player.

He also doesnt have the heart or desire for the game and its evident when he plays.

I honestly dont see Lonzo having a very long career and it has nothing to do with his ability.

I dont even think he enjoys playing the game at all.

He would prefer to rap.


Franchise players don't grow on trees, even in the lottery. We should know. We were in the lottery for 4 years in a row, including three #2 picks. Depending on how you look at Ingram, we maybe got one franchise player in the group and we are a team that drafts very well. There are a lot of variables that go into it, but fans tend to expect a star if they're picking high. Just doesn't work out that way.


All of our top draft picks, except Lonzo thus far have proven themselves to be All-Star quality(Randle, Russell) and potential franchise quality(Ingram) so that's pretty good on the scouting department.

And far as Lonzo goes his health is going to be a big factor in what he becomes and develops into, ultimately.


That's my whole point. All those guys are good! Some have made All Star teams. Are any of them franchise players in the traditional sense? I don't know if Ingram is going to lead you to a championship, but he keeps improving. Getting franchise players is really, really hard. Even with high lottery picks.


You can determine whether a player can lead a franchise to a Championship if you also look at whom their second options/players surrounding them are. Anthony Davis can't lead a team to a Championship by that metric, but he's without doubt a franchise player.

James Harden is also a franchise talent. But he has proven he can't lead a team to a Championship as the Rockets pretty much put everything around him that he wanted, every star, every coach, every system, every scenario and he blamed everyone else before blaming himself. So he's not the guy that will lead your team to a Championship. But he's a franchise talent regardless. But one that lacks leadership qualities.

There's been a lot of franchise talents through the league that weren't able to lead their team to a Championship for one reason or another. It's a 30 team league, and only one team wins. It doesn't mean the other 29 are lacking franchise talent. Scenario and teammates matter a lot.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
crackadon
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Aug 2013
Posts: 1015

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 3:36 pm    Post subject:

Baron Von Humongous wrote:
D-Shiznit wrote:
Baron Von Humongous wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
PASTOR RILEY wrote:
Release McKinney and get Kevin porter jr.


We are hard capped. Not sure if we could do that. Plus he’s a young prospect, I’m sure someone like the Knicks may trade for him.

He can be added on a 2-way. Unlikely to happen.


Is a trade involving McKinney for him possible? Salary wise etc

Looks like it, yes.


We got McKinney from the Cavs through the McGee trade. Pretty sure we can't just trade him back or that they would even want him.

This is the same reason we can't get Javale back from them either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
D-Shiznit
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Feb 2014
Posts: 1735

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 3:48 pm    Post subject:

If we can't trade McKinney, maybe ship Kostas for him, throw in a conditional 2nd rounder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakerican
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 3786

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 4:21 pm    Post subject:

Baron Von Humongous wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
PASTOR RILEY wrote:
Release McKinney and get Kevin porter jr.


We are hard capped. Not sure if we could do that. Plus he’s a young prospect, I’m sure someone like the Knicks may trade for him.

He can be added on a 2-way. Unlikely to happen.


2way money is not enough for the stash.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:20 pm    Post subject:

crackadon wrote:
Baron Von Humongous wrote:
D-Shiznit wrote:
Baron Von Humongous wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
PASTOR RILEY wrote:
Release McKinney and get Kevin porter jr.


We are hard capped. Not sure if we could do that. Plus he’s a young prospect, I’m sure someone like the Knicks may trade for him.

He can be added on a 2-way. Unlikely to happen.


Is a trade involving McKinney for him possible? Salary wise etc

Looks like it, yes.


We got McKinney from the Cavs through the McGee trade. Pretty sure we can't just trade him back or that they would even want him.

This is the same reason we can't get Javale back from them either.

I don't know if that's true.
_________________
Under New Management
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:41 pm    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
James Harden is also a franchise talent. But he has proven he can't lead a team to a Championship as the Rockets pretty much put everything around him that he wanted, every star, every coach, every system, every scenario and he blamed everyone else before blaming himself. So he's not the guy that will lead your team to a Championship. But he's a franchise talent regardless. But one that lacks leadership qualities.


The Rockets couldn't quite get past the peak Warriors. The Warriors then swept the Cavs and Lebron in the Finals. Sometimes winning a title isn't so much about being in the right place at the right time as it's about not being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The Olajuwon era Rockets could not beat the Seattle. The Sonics were like Kryptonite for the Rockets. But in the title seasons, someone else knocked off the Sonics.

The point is that the narrative gets distorted by the halo effect that comes from winning titles, and by the reverse effect that comes from not winning titles. It wasn't all that long ago in the grand scheme when people were saying that Lebron couldn't win a title, and a little before that when people were saying that Kobe couldn't win a title without Shaq. Toronto could never win a title, until they did.

It's tempting to turn the results of the playoffs into a moral judgment. Players whose teams win are winners, players whose teams fall short are losers. I don't mean that in the literal sense, but rather in the moral sense. The players on winning teams have intangible qualities that led to the result. The other players lost because they were deficient. Or at least that becomes the narrative.

I'm not a Harden fan. But can he take a team to a title? Oh, yeah, he can. Is he going to do it this year? Probably not. The Nets are defensively unsound, and we're just plain better if we're healthy. It really has nothing to do with Harden's leadership ability.
_________________
Internet Argument Resolved
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
crackadon
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Aug 2013
Posts: 1015

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 9:55 pm    Post subject:

Baron Von Humongous wrote:
crackadon wrote:
Baron Von Humongous wrote:
D-Shiznit wrote:
Baron Von Humongous wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
PASTOR RILEY wrote:
Release McKinney and get Kevin porter jr.


We are hard capped. Not sure if we could do that. Plus he’s a young prospect, I’m sure someone like the Knicks may trade for him.

He can be added on a 2-way. Unlikely to happen.


Is a trade involving McKinney for him possible? Salary wise etc

Looks like it, yes.


We got McKinney from the Cavs through the McGee trade. Pretty sure we can't just trade him back or that they would even want him.

This is the same reason we can't get Javale back from them either.

I don't know if that's true.


I honestly don't know if you're trolling half the time on this forum. A lot of the stuff you say is either wildly inaccurate or a take so bad that it looks like you're joking.

I looked it up. Something that would have taken you 1, 2 minutes max.

Quote:
WAITING PERIODS
No Re-Acquisitions — Once a team trades a player, it cannot reacquire that player during the same season. If the team trades a player between seasons, it cannot reacquire that player until the end of the next season. The only exceptions to these rules are if the player is waived and no other team claims the player.


https://cbabreakdown.com/trades
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
hype
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 4373
Location: Lake Nacimiento

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:18 pm    Post subject:

Aeneas Hunter wrote:
MJST wrote:
James Harden is also a franchise talent. But he has proven he can't lead a team to a Championship as the Rockets pretty much put everything around him that he wanted, every star, every coach, every system, every scenario and he blamed everyone else before blaming himself. So he's not the guy that will lead your team to a Championship. But he's a franchise talent regardless. But one that lacks leadership qualities.


The Rockets couldn't quite get past the peak Warriors. The Warriors then swept the Cavs and Lebron in the Finals. Sometimes winning a title isn't so much about being in the right place at the right time as it's about not being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The Olajuwon era Rockets could not beat the Seattle. The Sonics were like Kryptonite for the Rockets. But in the title seasons, someone else knocked off the Sonics.

The point is that the narrative gets distorted by the halo effect that comes from winning titles, and by the reverse effect that comes from not winning titles. It wasn't all that long ago in the grand scheme when people were saying that Lebron couldn't win a title, and a little before that when people were saying that Kobe couldn't win a title without Shaq. Toronto could never win a title, until they did.

It's tempting to turn the results of the playoffs into a moral judgment. Players whose teams win are winners, players whose teams fall short are losers. I don't mean that in the literal sense, but rather in the moral sense. The players on winning teams have intangible qualities that led to the result. The other players lost because they were deficient. Or at least that becomes the narrative.

I'm not a Harden fan. But can he take a team to a title? Oh, yeah, he can. Is he going to do it this year? Probably not. The Nets are defensively unsound, and we're just plain better if we're healthy. It really has nothing to do with Harden's leadership ability.


All of what you said is mostly true but Harden has been on the footsteps of advancing deeper many times and like clockwork he folds in the biggest lights. There's a reason why people always talk about him underperforming yearly. His 4 game 7's and 19 elimination games he is shooting about 40% and I remember hearing another stat which I can't remember exactly but in those same elimination games he has almost as many turnovers as assists. All of that is much lower then his averages by a large margin. So idk, I strongly believe he absolutely cant lead a team to the Championship as the #1 guy. If the Nets do win it in the next few years I have my money on it being KD's team as he doesn't shrink or borderline disappear in those massive moments. Now that he is a sidekick to possibly the best player in the game his chances are much better and he's in a spot he's never really been before outside of those early Thunder teams but they were super young at that point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29285
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2021 10:29 pm    Post subject:

King Randle wrote:

Magic screwed up the worst...Mitch/Jim actually did good here.


At strictly drafting. Sure. Mitch/Jim did better than Magic.

Overall. Magic >>>>>> Jim/Mitch

With Jim and Mitch we were getting laughed out of the room in Derozan, Melo, L. Aldridge, D. Jordan free agency meetings (if we even got the meeting). Free agents thought it was a joke how bad we were. We went from that to signing Bron in free agency with Magic. Signing Bron even without a 2nd star coming that offseason. Bron specifically said he signed here because of his sitdown with Magic.

Don't even get me started on those Deng and Mozgov contracts Jim/Mitch went with. They were horrible contracts the day they signed them. Not a "hindsight is 50/50" sort of thing.

Rob's better than all of the above. And we're back to where we should be because of him. But there are levels to this stuff.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Kobe_Is_King13
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 16 Jul 2018
Posts: 555

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 12:36 am    Post subject:

kikanga wrote:
King Randle wrote:

Magic screwed up the worst...Mitch/Jim actually did good here.


At strictly drafting. Sure. Mitch/Jim did better than Magic.

Overall. Magic >>>>>> Jim/Mitch

With Jim and Mitch we were getting laughed out of the room in Derozan, Melo, L. Aldridge, D. Jordan free agency meetings (if we even got the meeting). Free agents thought it was a joke how bad we were. We went from that to signing Bron in free agency with Magic. Signing Bron even without a 2nd star coming that offseason. Bron specifically said he signed here because of his sitdown with Magic.

Don't even get me started on those Deng and Mozgov contracts Jim/Mitch went with. They were horrible contracts the day they signed them. Not a "hindsight is 50/50" sort of thing.

Rob's better than all of the above. And we're back to where we should be because of him. But there are levels to this stuff.


LOL....They were pretty horrible immediately when they signed them. I distinctly remember thinking "What the h*** are they thinking??" when they signed them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 6:43 am    Post subject:

Folks, we still have Deng's cap hit...think about that. 2021. Deng. Still.

W.
T.
F.


_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Tue Jan 19, 2021 6:46 am    Post subject:

I think the point is that you can get players that are very good, and all-star caliber if you draft well. However to get those 1 or 2 top 2 players on a championship level team, is the most extremely difficult thing to attain. They are only about 8-10 players like that in the league, and maybe you get 1 player like that in a draft if you are fortunate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5645, 5646, 5647 ... 8558, 8559, 8560  Next
Page 5646 of 8560
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB