3-Point Shooting: Lakers still in need of Snipers / Ranked 29th in 3-PT Made and Percetage
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Wino
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jun 2002
Posts: 9674
Location: San Diego

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:03 am    Post subject:

Famous Quote:

Quote:
If we get a lot better, we should be OK!!

_________________
Never argue with stupid people! They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!! - Twain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 10:04 am    Post subject:

Wino wrote:
Famous Quote:

Quote:
If we get a lot better, we should be OK!!


Do it mitch
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AFireInside619
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 11447

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:38 am    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
Jordan-esque wrote:
Matt Thomas > Vander Blue


at shooting...yes
at basketball....not even close


That's the D-League MVP. Put some Respek in the man's name!😁
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46639

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:39 am    Post subject:

I wish we can get Belleneli or Terrence Ross, those guys would improve our 3pt shooting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AFireInside619
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 11447

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:44 am    Post subject:

justsomelakerfan wrote:
epak wrote:
kobeandgary wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
MJST wrote:
We had one.


Uh, who? Meeks? Ariza? Horry?


I am guessing he means Fisher.


Definitely nick young. Only guy I can think of.


If you're gonna shade DLO at least do it right and remember Lou MFin Williams last season.


Does anyone else here feel that a Ball/Russell backcourt could have been a train wreck of epic proportions? Egos, personality clashes, lack of backcourt defense, less chance for Ball's growth his rookie season. I think a trade by mid-season would have been inevitable and with money drying up and the league knowing they have us by the nuts, we would have traded DLO for much less than Bropez and Kuzma. And we would still have Moz's contract.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AFireInside619
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 11447

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:45 am    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
I wish we can get Belleneli or Terrence Ross, those guys would improve our 3pt shooting.


Or someone with a pulse who can hit a damn shot. I don't even care if it's inside the 3 point line.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:54 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Sure, Lonzo is a great ball mover. However, teams will quickly understand that Lonzo isn't going to break down his man and be a threat to score. So they will just stay on our shooters, ergo, less catch/shoot plays.


Huh? You're expecting the number of catch/shoot 3s to go down even further this year with Lonzo?

Guess we'll have to wait and see but that would be surprising to me considering the style Luke wants to play and the ball movement savant we have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 11:56 am    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Sure, Lonzo is a great ball mover. However, teams will quickly understand that Lonzo isn't going to break down his man and be a threat to score. So they will just stay on our shooters, ergo, less catch/shoot plays.


Huh? You're expecting the number of catch/shoot 3s to go down even further this year with Lonzo?

Guess we'll have to wait and see but that would be surprising to me considering the style Luke wants to play and the ball movement savant we have.


If Lonzo isn't breaking down the defense, why would teams sag off our shooters?

If anything, I can see teams trying to harass Lonzo on the point of attack and make him give up the ball.

We are also seeing some iso tendencies from several players too.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KBH
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Sep 2008
Posts: 12171

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:13 pm    Post subject: Re: Do Lakers still need to sign a pure 3-Point Shooter?

MJST wrote:
Nashlight wrote:
Aside from our rookies who haven't played an NBA game yet to evaluate more accurately, no one else in this team has shot over 40% from three's while also attempting more than five per game. Nick Young was the only one to do it last season and he's gone. Argument can be made this team may not be as good as last year's in terms of 3-point shooting. Seems we'll be a running team mostly.


What we need is a scoring three point shooting guard that can trade ball handling responsibilities with Lonzo but is enough of a scorer to drop 20-30 if need be when the offense breaks down.

But there isn't that many available. KCP needs to play much better than he played tonight however.


I see what you did here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:15 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Sure, Lonzo is a great ball mover. However, teams will quickly understand that Lonzo isn't going to break down his man and be a threat to score. So they will just stay on our shooters, ergo, less catch/shoot plays.


Huh? You're expecting the number of catch/shoot 3s to go down even further this year with Lonzo?

Guess we'll have to wait and see but that would be surprising to me considering the style Luke wants to play and the ball movement savant we have.


If Lonzo isn't breaking down the defense, why would teams sag off our shooters?

If anything, I can see teams trying to harass Lonzo on the point of attack and make him give up the ball.

We are also seeing some iso tendencies from several players too.


Because you don't need that old school PG to break down the defense all by his lonesome to get help defense to come to you. I don't expect that type of offense at all.

You can get that through a more team oriented approach. For instance, a simple pick to create a mismatch scenario who Ball then could blow by. Or a roll off the screen, dump the ball in, help comes, kick out to shooter. I don't know all the technical terms, but, let's just GSW doesn't get their looks from dribble penetration. Seems to me they get their looks off of screens and picks that cause mismatches or open looks. Spurs too. Is Parker one hand dribbling inside to kick out to a corner 3pt shooter? No.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jordan-esque
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 10265

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:50 pm    Post subject:

Yes they do OP, yes they do.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nash Vegas
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 7239

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:32 pm    Post subject:

Tanlentueux wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
No question. None of the guys are 40% shooters.


Kuzma looks like he'll be the one but we need more. Starters can't hit a 3 consistently.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bol
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 4045

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:36 pm    Post subject:

In this league, you win with stars and shooters. The Lakers don't really have any of either. Thus, bad team.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
splashmtn
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Aug 2016
Posts: 3961

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:39 pm    Post subject:

Jordan-esque wrote:
This Lakers team don't have real 3-pt shooters, they have players who can shoot a 3. There's a difference.
This is exactly the issue.

but having a 3 point specialist that can't do anything else but that wont work on a super young team with no other superstars.

He will get destroyed on defense and he wont be able to do anything when they play a good team with a smart defense that will just sit on our shooter. remember the shooter only guy can't dribble that way, can't create his own shot. so he's done if he can't get an open look.

so to me thats not what we really want. we want a guy that can handle the ball a bit and hit that 3 while also being a decent defender. but that kind of guy will cost a bit more money and most good to really good teams already have this guy. there arent this many types left. if at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:41 pm    Post subject:

splashmtn wrote:
Jordan-esque wrote:
This Lakers team don't have real 3-pt shooters, they have players who can shoot a 3. There's a difference.
This is exactly the issue.

but having a 3 point specialist that can't do anything else but that wont work on a super young team with no other superstars.

He will get destroyed on defense and he wont be able to do anything when they play a good team with a smart defense that will just sit on our shooter. remember the shooter only guy can't dribble that way, can't create his own shot. so he's done if he can't get an open look.

so to me thats not what we really want. we want a guy that can handle the ball a bit and hit that 3 while also being a decent defender. but that kind of guy will cost a bit more money and most good to really good teams already have this guy. there arent this many types left. if at all.


Maybe Brooklyn will be open to trading D'Angelo Russell. =)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lonzo-Lite
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 May 2011
Posts: 5090

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 8:52 am    Post subject:

splashmtn wrote:
Jordan-esque wrote:
This Lakers team don't have real 3-pt shooters, they have players who can shoot a 3. There's a difference.
This is exactly the issue.

but having a 3 point specialist that can't do anything else but that wont work on a super young team with no other superstars.

He will get destroyed on defense and he wont be able to do anything when they play a good team with a smart defense that will just sit on our shooter. remember the shooter only guy can't dribble that way, can't create his own shot. so he's done if he can't get an open look.

so to me thats not what we really want. we want a guy that can handle the ball a bit and hit that 3 while also being a decent defender. but that kind of guy will cost a bit more money and most good to really good teams already have this guy. there arent this many types left. if at all.



The current team really lacks pure 3-point shooters.

All our good shooters seems to be our rookies. I think that's why Maginka all drafted players who shoot 3's. Kuzma, Hart, TB are all supposed to be 3 and D guys, but they're still unproven.
_________________
Tacos
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nash Vegas
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 7239

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 10:26 am    Post subject:

Mike Dunleavy is still unsigned, 36 years old but shot 42% in Atlanta last season.

The Machine Sasha Vujacic is also still unsigned
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
G_DawgLA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 12 Apr 2001
Posts: 2768
Location: SO CAL

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:02 pm    Post subject:

Should've kept Matt Thomas a 2-way player. He is Penberthy 2.0
_________________
"Here come the Lakers!" - R.I.P. Chick Hearn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Staccatos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Jul 2002
Posts: 2416

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:09 pm    Post subject:

G_DawgLA wrote:
Should've kept Matt Thomas a 2-way player. He is Penberthy 2.0


Yeah, I would've kept Matt Thomas over Caruso or Blue.

Matt Thomas currently shooting 80% from 3pt range in Spanish League play (granted only one game so far but went 4 of 5)

http://basketball.eurobasket.com/team/Spain/Rio-Natura-Monbus-Obradoiro-CAB/1348?Page=3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Scoffs
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 12 Aug 2001
Posts: 874

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:21 pm    Post subject:

Buy out Matt Thomas' contract and get him back here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kentu_tiro
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 2798

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:28 pm    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
No question. None of the guys are 40% shooters.


Welcome back Mike! Apart from shooters we need someone who can penetrate the lane. Right now the open shots are as good as the screen set. When that fails, nothing else works. We need a guy that can get to the middle to either pass or score.
_________________
The road back to the top...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
audioaxes
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 12573

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:56 pm    Post subject:

people forgot about Hart? he can potentially be another D and 3 player in the mix if he pans out.
_________________
(bleep) Kawhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:02 pm    Post subject:

there is a kid playing for Brooklyn tonight, stroking it from all over the court....but it will be a while before he is an UFA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17876

PostPosted: Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:07 pm    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
there is a kid playing for Brooklyn tonight, stroking it from all over the court....but it will be a while before he is an UFA

I have a feeling he's not gonna be interested in the Lakers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54570

PostPosted: Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:29 am    Post subject:

"Put me in Coach'" #KyleKuzma
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 6 of 8
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB