THE Political Thread (ALL Political Discussion Here - See Rules, P. 1)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 3072, 3073, 3074 ... 3669, 3670, 3671  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
FernieBee
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Nov 2003
Posts: 8033
Location: 921SD

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 4:45 am    Post subject:

Nikki Haley says she won't run for president in 2024, if Agent Orange runs. In other words, she will kiss the ring and step aside for Da Don.
_________________
Garvey, Lopes, Cey, Russell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jodeke
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 67620
Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 9:07 am    Post subject:

FernieBee wrote:
Nikki Haley says she won't run for president in 2024, if Agent Orange runs. In other words, she will kiss the ring and step aside for Da Don.


Who do Republicans have as viable candidates in 2024 besides Trump? I don't think he can win. Unless the Republican party does a facelift I don't think they really have a winnable candidate. IMO whoever runs will have to cheat.
_________________
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
hoopschick29
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Jul 2004
Posts: 12898
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 10:32 am    Post subject:

jodeke wrote:
FernieBee wrote:
Nikki Haley says she won't run for president in 2024, if Agent Orange runs. In other words, she will kiss the ring and step aside for Da Don.


Who do Republicans have as viable candidates in 2024 besides Trump? I don't think he can win. Unless the Republican party does a facelift I don't think they really have a winnable candidate. IMO whoever runs will have to cheat.


It's not about who can win overall. It's about who can get out of the primary. No one (at least no Republicans) feels anyone can beat Trump to win the nomination.
_________________
So glad we gave you your flowers while you were here, Kobe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25076

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:06 am    Post subject:

hoopschick29 wrote:
jodeke wrote:
FernieBee wrote:
Nikki Haley says she won't run for president in 2024, if Agent Orange runs. In other words, she will kiss the ring and step aside for Da Don.


Who do Republicans have as viable candidates in 2024 besides Trump? I don't think he can win. Unless the Republican party does a facelift I don't think they really have a winnable candidate. IMO whoever runs will have to cheat.


It's not about who can win overall. It's about who can get out of the primary. No one (at least no Republicans) feels anyone can beat Trump to win the nomination.


DeSantis prob would do well, a Trump-DeSantis ticket would solidify that base but Biden-Kamala should be able to beat them
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wilt
LG Contributor
LG Contributor


Joined: 29 Dec 2002
Posts: 13725

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 11:14 am    Post subject:

As much as they'd want to be his VP, I think they all secretly hope he dies very soon. And then they all can claim that he endorsed them. They're all ambitious authoritarians, and they don't want to wait another four years. People like Cruz and Rubio and DeSantis know the Electoral College works in their favor and they know voter suppression laws will have a big impact. And if they can get back the House and/or the Senate, they can overthrow a close election that they lost.
_________________
¡Hala Madrid!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 2:43 pm    Post subject:

Four years (or three if we're talking the start of the campaigning) is a long way away. You figure that we'll know if Trump has any chance within the next two years, and likely much sooner. All the indictments I expect to come will probably occur during that time, making no mention of the evidence that's likely going to be revealed in the civil suits that have already been filed (and still might be filed) against him.

I think most Republicans will be more than happy to jump on the anti-trump train as soon as they see some light of day. They just need the permission that a barrage of criminal lawsuits and previously undisclosed, damning information will provide. Once the tide turns on Trump just enough, I think we'll see a cascade. Only question is how much time and how much new info it will take to get us there. Certainly, we've all been wrong before about where the line would be drawn. I don't expect it will be any more clear for at least a little bit.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DaMuleRules
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 52654
Location: Making a safety stop at 15 feet.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 2:58 pm    Post subject:

LakerSanity wrote:
Four years (or three if we're talking the start of the campaigning) is a long way away. You figure that we'll know if Trump has any chance within the next two years, and likely much sooner. All the indictments I expect to come will probably occur during that time, making no mention of the evidence that's likely going to be revealed in the civil suits that have already been filed (and still might be filed) against him.

I think most Republicans will be more than happy to jump on the anti-trump train as soon as they see some light of day. They just need the permission that a barrage of criminal lawsuits and previously undisclosed, damning information will provide. Once the tide turns on Trump just enough, I think we'll see a cascade. Only question is how much time and how much new info it will take to get us there. Certainly, we've all been wrong before about where the line would be drawn. I don't expect it will be any more clear for at least a little bit.


The thing is, we have been expecting that for a while now . . . and the more time that passes, the less likely it is to occur. We've been hearing about all this mountain of evidence and how SDNY etc are just champing at the bit to go after Trump and how it will certainly be Trump's downfall for seemingly forever . . . yet here we are and there he still is.
_________________
You thought God was an architect, now you know
He’s something like a pipe bomb ready to blow
And everything you built that’s all for show
goes up in flames
In 24 frames


Jason Isbell

Man, do those lyrics resonate right now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersRGolden
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 7922
Location: Lake Forest

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 3:34 pm    Post subject:

DaMuleRules wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
Four years (or three if we're talking the start of the campaigning) is a long way away. You figure that we'll know if Trump has any chance within the next two years, and likely much sooner. All the indictments I expect to come will probably occur during that time, making no mention of the evidence that's likely going to be revealed in the civil suits that have already been filed (and still might be filed) against him.

I think most Republicans will be more than happy to jump on the anti-trump train as soon as they see some light of day. They just need the permission that a barrage of criminal lawsuits and previously undisclosed, damning information will provide. Once the tide turns on Trump just enough, I think we'll see a cascade. Only question is how much time and how much new info it will take to get us there. Certainly, we've all been wrong before about where the line would be drawn. I don't expect it will be any more clear for at least a little bit.


The thing is, we have been expecting that for a while now . . . and the more time that passes, the less likely it is to occur. We've been hearing about all this mountain of evidence and how SDNY etc are just champing at the bit to go after Trump and how it will certainly be Trump's downfall for seemingly forever . . . yet here we are and there he still is.


He murdered Sicknick. There are no depths of depravity deep enough to trigger his downfall. He will be the GOP until he physically isn't around anymore.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChefLinda
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 24158
Location: Boston

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 6:00 pm    Post subject:

Biden "ending" war in Afghanistan by Sept. 11.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16703

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 6:44 pm    Post subject:

I know he won’t but gaetz going to jail would be solid
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SweetP
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 6054
Location: My own little piece of reality

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 7:31 pm    Post subject:

Halflife wrote:
I know he won’t but gaetz going to jail would be solid


If they can prove he had sex with a 17 yr-old and/or aided in her crossing state lines for sex at that age, he is going to jail.
_________________
“There is always light if only we're brave enough to see it, if only we're brave enough to be it.” --Amanda Gorman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SweetP
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 6054
Location: My own little piece of reality

PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2021 9:10 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
MeidasTouch.com @MeidasTouch

Federal agents executed a search warrant and seized Matt Gaetz’s iPhone last winter as they do with all innocent people.


The FBI doesn't seize a congressman's phone unless they have some serious concerns. And it turns out his indicted friend Joel Greenberg has been cooperating with the feds since Dec also. All this under Billy Barr's DOJ. Dec was when Gaetz asked Trump for a blanket pardon also I believe.
_________________
“There is always light if only we're brave enough to see it, if only we're brave enough to be it.” --Amanda Gorman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
FernieBee
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Nov 2003
Posts: 8033
Location: 921SD

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:20 am    Post subject:

It appears the GOP knew what kind of pervert Gaetz was, way back in December of last year, but kept silent about it.

QAnus and other GOP nuts need to get in a tizzy about one of their own doing exactly what they said Hillary (and others like her) were supposedly doing.

Pizzagate vs. PizzaGaetz


_________________
Garvey, Lopes, Cey, Russell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LarryCoon
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 11 Aug 2002
Posts: 11265

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:32 am    Post subject:

What was that one meme? Matt Gaetz is everything the republicans were looking for in Hunter Biden.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
ribeye
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Nov 2001
Posts: 12630

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:58 am    Post subject:

What a great story!

CEO Hits Back At Fox News After They Derided Him For Offering $70,000 Minimum Salaries

Quote:
Back in 2015, the tech entrepreneur shocked the business world by slashing his own $1.1 million pay package to help fund a minimum “living wage” of $70,000 for all workers at his credit card processing company Gravity Payments.

Price’s decision led to him being heavily criticized as a “socialist” on Fox News and Fox Business. In addition, some clients dropped Gravity for reasons that included fears the salary hike would cause their rates to rise.

But in the years since, Price has been hailed as a success by Harvard Business School and Inc. magazine, which noted the number of employees at Gravity has doubled while the value of payments that the company processes has gone from $3.8 billion a year to $10.2 billion.


Embedded in the story:

https://twitter.com/DanPriceSeattle/status/1382022640961994753

Since our $70k min wage was announced 6 years ago today:
*Our revenue tripled
*Head count grew 70%
*Customer base doubled
*Babies had by staff grew 10x
*70% of employees paid down debt
*Homes bought by employees grew 10x
*401(k) contributions grew 155%
*Turnover dropped in half
_________________
"A metronome keeps time by using a Ringo"


Last edited by ribeye on Wed Apr 14, 2021 7:00 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 6:59 am    Post subject:

DaMuleRules wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
Four years (or three if we're talking the start of the campaigning) is a long way away. You figure that we'll know if Trump has any chance within the next two years, and likely much sooner. All the indictments I expect to come will probably occur during that time, making no mention of the evidence that's likely going to be revealed in the civil suits that have already been filed (and still might be filed) against him.

I think most Republicans will be more than happy to jump on the anti-trump train as soon as they see some light of day. They just need the permission that a barrage of criminal lawsuits and previously undisclosed, damning information will provide. Once the tide turns on Trump just enough, I think we'll see a cascade. Only question is how much time and how much new info it will take to get us there. Certainly, we've all been wrong before about where the line would be drawn. I don't expect it will be any more clear for at least a little bit.


The thing is, we have been expecting that for a while now . . . and the more time that passes, the less likely it is to occur. We've been hearing about all this mountain of evidence and how SDNY etc are just champing at the bit to go after Trump and how it will certainly be Trump's downfall for seemingly forever . . . yet here we are and there he still is.


They were hamstrung until he was no.longer President. SDNY just hired forensic accountant to go through all of his financial records which they only received after he left office. There sre least two lawsuits I know of filed by house reps for his role in Jan 6. There is also the ongoing defamation lawsuit against him which is now moving moving forward. There are apparently a number Rod other investigations going on, including possible charges for obstruction of justice relating to the muller probe.

Its been 3 months since he left office, and only like a.month since Garland was confirmed. Patience. You may be right two years from now but I don't see there being any real delay right now to cite to justify the pessimism.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wilt
LG Contributor
LG Contributor


Joined: 29 Dec 2002
Posts: 13725

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 8:56 am    Post subject:

Yeah, there were some unrealistic expectations that either the state of New York or the SDNY would issue indictments at 12:01 on January 20. It's only recently that they got some of the financial documents. It takes time to go through hundreds of thousands of pages, get people to cooperate, and build a case.
_________________
¡Hala Madrid!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DaMuleRules
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 52654
Location: Making a safety stop at 15 feet.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:27 am    Post subject:

LakerSanity wrote:
DaMuleRules wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
Four years (or three if we're talking the start of the campaigning) is a long way away. You figure that we'll know if Trump has any chance within the next two years, and likely much sooner. All the indictments I expect to come will probably occur during that time, making no mention of the evidence that's likely going to be revealed in the civil suits that have already been filed (and still might be filed) against him.

I think most Republicans will be more than happy to jump on the anti-trump train as soon as they see some light of day. They just need the permission that a barrage of criminal lawsuits and previously undisclosed, damning information will provide. Once the tide turns on Trump just enough, I think we'll see a cascade. Only question is how much time and how much new info it will take to get us there. Certainly, we've all been wrong before about where the line would be drawn. I don't expect it will be any more clear for at least a little bit.


The thing is, we have been expecting that for a while now . . . and the more time that passes, the less likely it is to occur. We've been hearing about all this mountain of evidence and how SDNY etc are just champing at the bit to go after Trump and how it will certainly be Trump's downfall for seemingly forever . . . yet here we are and there he still is.


They were hamstrung until he was no.longer President. SDNY just hired forensic accountant to go through all of his financial records which they only received after he left office. There sre least two lawsuits I know of filed by house reps for his role in Jan 6. There is also the ongoing defamation lawsuit against him which is now moving moving forward. There are apparently a number Rod other investigations going on, including possible charges for obstruction of justice relating to the muller probe.

Its been 3 months since he left office, and only like a.month since Garland was confirmed. Patience. You may be right two years from now but I don't see there being any real delay right now to cite to justify the pessimism.


The pessimism comes from a lifetime of observing that people like Trump virtually never see and meaningful consequences for their actions. We'll see what happens, and I certainly hope I am wrong in believing that Trump will skate, but I'm don't anticipate otherwise.
_________________
You thought God was an architect, now you know
He’s something like a pipe bomb ready to blow
And everything you built that’s all for show
goes up in flames
In 24 frames


Jason Isbell

Man, do those lyrics resonate right now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChefLinda
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 24158
Location: Boston

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:10 am    Post subject:

DaMuleRules wrote:
The pessimism comes from a lifetime of observing that people like Trump virtually never see and meaningful consequences for their actions. We'll see what happens, and I certainly hope I am wrong in believing that Trump will skate, but I'm don't anticipate otherwise.


On the other side of the ledger, Bernie Madoff died in prison today. Maybe it's a sign.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
angrypuppy
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 32752

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 12:56 pm    Post subject:

ChefLinda wrote:
Biden "ending" war in Afghanistan by Sept. 11.



We should never have entered into a war with those piss ants. Much like the war in Vietnam, the objective crouched in political nonsense rather than any sustainable, pragmatic goal. And like Vietnam, once our naiveté was exposed the rationalization to continue the war changed. The end game will be the same too, once the US stops using the military force and money to prop up a weak government, the country will fall.

Our presence in both wars only provoked more instability within each region.

Quote:
"We were attacked. We went to war with clear goals. We achieved those objectives," Biden went on. "Bin Laden is dead and al Qaeda is degraded in Afghanistan and it's time to end the forever war."


https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/14/politics/joe-biden-afghanistan-announcement/index.html

Wrong. We screwed up badly after we had Bin Laden cornered at Tora Bora. That should have been the first clue that we had no idea what we were doing there. Needless to say, Bin Laden was killed in Pakistan, and of course al Qaeda is still at work in Afghanistan. The real opponent of course in Afghanistan was Taliban, who will fill the power vacuum after the US leaves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DaMuleRules
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Dec 2006
Posts: 52654
Location: Making a safety stop at 15 feet.

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 3:31 pm    Post subject:

angrypuppy wrote:
ChefLinda wrote:
Biden "ending" war in Afghanistan by Sept. 11.



We should never have entered into a war with those piss ants. Much like the war in Vietnam, the objective crouched in political nonsense rather than any sustainable, pragmatic goal. And like Vietnam, once our naiveté was exposed the rationalization to continue the war changed. The end game will be the same too, once the US stops using the military force and money to prop up a weak government, the country will fall.

Our presence in both wars only provoked more instability within each region.

Quote:
"We were attacked. We went to war with clear goals. We achieved those objectives," Biden went on. "Bin Laden is dead and al Qaeda is degraded in Afghanistan and it's time to end the forever war."


https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/14/politics/joe-biden-afghanistan-announcement/index.html

Wrong. We screwed up badly after we had Bin Laden cornered at Tora Bora. That should have been the first clue that we had no idea what we were doing there. Needless to say, Bin Laden was killed in Pakistan, and of course al Qaeda is still at work in Afghanistan. The real opponent of course in Afghanistan was Taliban, who will fill the power vacuum after the US leaves.


And Biden has totally miscalculated choosing 9/11 as the targeted outdate. I know the idea was to tie it into what that date symbolizes for us in the United States. But, as several experts on the subject of Afghanistan and the Taliban have pointed out, that date carries heavy symbolism for them and others who align with them - one of victory over the US . . . a day they successfully brought misery and death this nation. Setting that date as the target plays into their ability to call the withdrawal a victory for them—The US retreats based on a deadline that is a great day for them and one of pride. This adds to that pride. Especially since, as you point out, they will now have a power vascuum to fill.

Just a really foolish choice to tie the withdrawal to such a date.
_________________
You thought God was an architect, now you know
He’s something like a pipe bomb ready to blow
And everything you built that’s all for show
goes up in flames
In 24 frames


Jason Isbell

Man, do those lyrics resonate right now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16703

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 4:22 pm    Post subject:

SweetP wrote:
Halflife wrote:
I know he won’t but gaetz going to jail would be solid


If they can prove he had sex with a 17 yr-old and/or aided in her crossing state lines for sex at that age, he is going to jail.

Fingers crossed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SweetP
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 6054
Location: My own little piece of reality

PostPosted: Wed Apr 14, 2021 5:25 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
Mystery Solvent @MysterySolvent

6 Senators voted no to create Asian Hate Crime legislation.

COTTON
CRUZ
HAWLEY
MARSHALL
PAUL
TUBERVILLE

What is wrong with them??


The usual Republican a-holes
_________________
“There is always light if only we're brave enough to see it, if only we're brave enough to be it.” --Amanda Gorman
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25076

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 5:47 am    Post subject:

Ending war in Afghanistan
Stimulus
Russia sanction for election interfering (Thanks Jodeke)
Healthcare... not yet I guess but
Expansion of SC fight begins!

Manchin dependent


Last edited by governator on Thu Apr 15, 2021 7:32 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jodeke
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 67620
Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 15, 2021 7:15 am    Post subject:

^^^ Getting tough on Russia with sanctions. What the hell is wrong with Manchin?
_________________
Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Off Topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 3072, 3073, 3074 ... 3669, 3670, 3671  Next
Page 3073 of 3671
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB