OFFICIAL BRANDON INGRAM THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1233, 1234, 1235 ... 1883, 1884, 1885  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Lakesh0wtime
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Mar 2016
Posts: 5358

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:49 pm    Post subject:

Lol he makes 1 or 2 of his wide open threes and he’s close to 20 points and people would say he played Well.

Just a bad shooting night.

Was able to shake it off in the 3rd.

Thought he should’ve played more in the 4th
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
tox
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Nov 2015
Posts: 17880

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:50 pm    Post subject:

matrixskillz wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Kuzma definitely should start over Ingram

So we can get the same amount of points but 10x less defense? Lol


So we get a player who actually believes in his abilities and can play off the ball without needing plays run for him. He’s also a much better 3 pt shooter.


Ingram: 28 Min., 16 PTS (7-15 FG, 0-4 3PT, 2-4 FT) 4 RBD, 1 AST, 2 STL, 2 BLK, 1 TO
Kuzma: 29 Min., 15 PTS (5-15 PG, 1-7 3PT, 4-5 FT), 5 RBD, 0 AST, 1 STL, 0 BLK, 1 TO


Give Kuzma the looks Ingram got and he’ll knock them down at a much better rate. He’s a better scorer than Ingram and knows how to play off ball effectively.


There's probably some truth to that but the difference in their defense is way bigger.
Anyway it doesn't matter since Kuzma is a 5 anyway
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
matrixskillz
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Jun 2008
Posts: 7502

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:51 pm    Post subject:

tox wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Kuzma definitely should start over Ingram

So we can get the same amount of points but 10x less defense? Lol


So we get a player who actually believes in his abilities and can play off the ball without needing plays run for him. He’s also a much better 3 pt shooter.


Ingram: 28 Min., 16 PTS (7-15 FG, 0-4 3PT, 2-4 FT) 4 RBD, 1 AST, 2 STL, 2 BLK, 1 TO
Kuzma: 29 Min., 15 PTS (5-15 PG, 1-7 3PT, 4-5 FT), 5 RBD, 0 AST, 1 STL, 0 BLK, 1 TO


Give Kuzma the looks Ingram got and he’ll knock them down at a much better rate. He’s a better scorer than Ingram and knows how to play off ball effectively.


There's probably some truth to that but the difference in their defense is way bigger.
Anyway it doesn't matter since Kuzma is a 5 anyway


Kuzma should never play the 5 and Ingram shouldn’t play the 4. They’re both out of position.
_________________
We only celebrate championships.

"I GOT WHEATIES!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:52 pm    Post subject:

tox wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Kuzma definitely should start over Ingram

So we can get the same amount of points but 10x less defense? Lol


So we get a player who actually believes in his abilities and can play off the ball without needing plays run for him. He’s also a much better 3 pt shooter.


Ingram: 28 Min., 16 PTS (7-15 FG, 0-4 3PT, 2-4 FT) 4 RBD, 1 AST, 2 STL, 2 BLK, 1 TO
Kuzma: 29 Min., 15 PTS (5-15 PG, 1-7 3PT, 4-5 FT), 5 RBD, 0 AST, 1 STL, 0 BLK, 1 TO


Give Kuzma the looks Ingram got and he’ll knock them down at a much better rate. He’s a better scorer than Ingram and knows how to play off ball effectively.


There's probably some truth to that but the difference in their defense is way bigger.
Anyway it doesn't matter since Kuzma is a 5 anyway


the difference you see is because he is trying to guard much bigger 5's. would be a totally different story if he guarded his own position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 9:52 pm    Post subject:

Ingram is barely strong enough to play 3, he's not a 4. Kuz is definitely more suited for 4 than Ingram.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakesh0wtime
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Mar 2016
Posts: 5358

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:02 pm    Post subject:

Jesusdelonla wrote:
tox wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
LakerSanity wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
matrixskillz wrote:
Kuzma definitely should start over Ingram

So we can get the same amount of points but 10x less defense? Lol


So we get a player who actually believes in his abilities and can play off the ball without needing plays run for him. He’s also a much better 3 pt shooter.


Ingram: 28 Min., 16 PTS (7-15 FG, 0-4 3PT, 2-4 FT) 4 RBD, 1 AST, 2 STL, 2 BLK, 1 TO
Kuzma: 29 Min., 15 PTS (5-15 PG, 1-7 3PT, 4-5 FT), 5 RBD, 0 AST, 1 STL, 0 BLK, 1 TO


Give Kuzma the looks Ingram got and he’ll knock them down at a much better rate. He’s a better scorer than Ingram and knows how to play off ball effectively.


There's probably some truth to that but the difference in their defense is way bigger.
Anyway it doesn't matter since Kuzma is a 5 anyway


the difference you see is because he is trying to guard much bigger 5's. would be a totally different story if he guarded his own position.


Lol have you seen him guard wings and guards? He can’t move his feet against them either. He’s not a good defender.

Offensively yes he’s good. But that gap between and and BI as in regard to off ball offense is not as big as the gap in defense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakesh0wtime
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Mar 2016
Posts: 5358

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:09 pm    Post subject:

Did a good job guarding CJ tonight
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:11 pm    Post subject:

Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Did a good job guarding CJ tonight


BI totally shut down Jake Layman.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29354
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:13 pm    Post subject:

Pretty average game. He was probably our 3rd or 4th best player tonight. So he's not the first person I think about when talking about disappointing performances.
But he can play better than he did.
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
The Juggernaut
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Aug 2017
Posts: 4572

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:14 pm    Post subject:

Why is his shooting confidence so damn low? He took the open shots tonight but it didn't seem like he was shooting it with confidence.

Does anyone know if Magic hired that shooting coach he said he would? We desperately need a good one
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46684

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:14 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Did a good job guarding CJ tonight


BI totally shut down Jake Layman.


Blazers are good for having a bunch of no names but still end up winning a decent amount of games, POR fans should at least be happy that they have good regular season teams.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
audioaxes
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 12573

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:15 pm    Post subject:

would like to see him cut down on those contested long jumpers. if thats the best you can get from the defense on that possession then get it back to Lebron.
_________________
(bleep) Kawhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:15 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
epak wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Did a good job guarding CJ tonight


BI totally shut down Jake Layman.


Blazers are good for having a bunch of no names but still end up winning a decent amount of games, POR fans should at least be happy that they have good regular season teams.


If you don't know Jake Layman, then I don't know what to say.
RE: BI, it's game 1 of a long season. He'll be fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakesh0wtime
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Mar 2016
Posts: 5358

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:16 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Did a good job guarding CJ tonight


BI totally shut down Jake Layman.


Yup! The human torch haaha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46684

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:17 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
epak wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Did a good job guarding CJ tonight


BI totally shut down Jake Layman.


Blazers are good for having a bunch of no names but still end up winning a decent amount of games, POR fans should at least be happy that they have good regular season teams.


If you don't know Jake Layman, then I don't know what to say.
RE: BI, it's game 1 of a long season. He'll be fine.


No idea who he is, is he a solid player?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:20 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
epak wrote:
Lakesh0wtime wrote:
Did a good job guarding CJ tonight


BI totally shut down Jake Layman.


Blazers are good for having a bunch of no names but still end up winning a decent amount of games, POR fans should at least be happy that they have good regular season teams.


If you don't know Jake Layman, then I don't know what to say.
RE: BI, it's game 1 of a long season. He'll be fine.

He's no Pat Connaughton. I mean...Sauce Castillo.
_________________
Under New Management
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:49 pm    Post subject:

Any theories as to his slow starts?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:56 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 10:57 pm    Post subject:

KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...


Ok. But why slow in first halves only?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:05 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...


Ok. But why slow in first halves only?


Opportunities open up for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to impose successfully at-will. Shots go in for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to make shots consistently
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:07 pm    Post subject:

KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...


Ok. But why slow in first halves only?


Opportunities open up for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to impose successfully at-will. Shots go in for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to make shots consistently


I’ve noticed this too .. Really think not trading him for PG was a mistake

Hoping I’m wrong but idk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:12 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...


Ok. But why slow in first halves only?


Opportunities open up for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to impose successfully at-will. Shots go in for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to make shots consistently


I’ve noticed this too .. Really think not trading him for PG was a mistake

Hoping I’m wrong but idk


Ultimately if he’s good next year and we sign someone this summer , that’s better than only being able to sign PG and having no capspace(or Kawhi saying he doesn’t want to be on a super-team, which is what his mouthpiece Cris Carter said)

So , BI=80% of PG + Kawhi , is better than only PG
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:25 pm    Post subject:

KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
LKA wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...


Ok. But why slow in first halves only?


Opportunities open up for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to impose successfully at-will. Shots go in for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to make shots consistently


I’ve noticed this too .. Really think not trading him for PG was a mistake

Hoping I’m wrong but idk


Ultimately if he’s good next year and we sign someone this summer , that’s better than only being able to sign PG and having no capspace(or Kawhi saying he doesn’t want to be on a super-team, which is what his mouthpiece Cris Carter said)

So , BI=80% of PG + Kawhi , is better than only PG


I guess that’s true. There might come a time where we have too many forwards tho (if we were to acquire Kawhi)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46684

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:26 pm    Post subject:

KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...


Ok. But why slow in first halves only?


Opportunities open up for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to impose successfully at-will. Shots go in for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to make shots consistently


there is a reason why people compare him to another guy in KD who basically uses his skill to get off any shot, don’t think BI lacks any skill the guy is compared with a lot of skilled offensive players, not sure where the idea came from that he doesn’t use his talent to make shots.


Last edited by Inspector Gadget on Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:28 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
KeepItRealOrElse wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
Any theories as to his slow starts?


Not a guaranteed scorer...


Ok. But why slow in first halves only?


Opportunities open up for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to impose successfully at-will. Shots go in for him when they do - he’s not skilled enough to make shots consistently


I always thought he had the skill and talent to get off any shot he wanted he wasn’t mentally engaged in this game at all, there is a reason why people compare him to another guy in KD who basically uses his skill to get off any shot.


That’s always been a ridiculous comparison imo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1233, 1234, 1235 ... 1883, 1884, 1885  Next
Page 1234 of 1885
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB