OFFICIAL Class of 2015 Okafor/Mudiay/non-DLO Rookies Discussion
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 89, 90, 91  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mhan00
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 32076

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:45 am    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I don't think it was he offense per se that deterred the Lakers. It was his defense and how they projected him going forward on that end. No doubt okafor's offense is pretty advanced now. I don't think many disagreed on that end.


And it was that they thought they could nab Deandre Jordan or Lamarcus in free agency


I hope that isn't true,because if it is then that shows a level of delusion I'm not comfortable with our front office having.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message ICQ Number Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:50 am    Post subject:

mhan00 wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I don't think it was he offense per se that deterred the Lakers. It was his defense and how they projected him going forward on that end. No doubt okafor's offense is pretty advanced now. I don't think many disagreed on that end.


And it was that they thought they could nab Deandre Jordan or Lamarcus in free agency


I hope that isn't true,because if it is then that shows a level of delusion I'm not comfortable with our front office having.


I don't think it was a clear cut, "we have DJ or LMA in the bag" kind of thinking.

More like looking at the lay of the land FA-wise. Just in terms of more polished big men FAs, there were:

LMA, DJ, Lopez x2, Hibbert (trade), Monroe, Chandler, etc.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fiendishoc
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 8488
Location: The (real) short corner

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:55 am    Post subject:

You have to think of the quote from the old school perspective of "never pass on a big man" which doesn't make sense if you look at it objectively, but may be something that they have to rationalize. Doesn't mean that they didn't think Russell was the BPA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:00 am    Post subject:

fiendishoc wrote:
You have to think of the quote from the old school perspective of "never pass on a big man" which doesn't make sense if you look at it objectively, but may be something that they have to rationalize. Doesn't mean that they didn't think Russell was the BPA.


I have 0 doubts that if KAT was on the board the Lakers take him. I think Oak's defense really scared them off.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fiendishoc
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 8488
Location: The (real) short corner

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:01 am    Post subject:

It seems like the team that a lot of Lakers fans are pining for is this one:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/MIN/2010.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:43 am    Post subject:

That was Okafor's best game last night. He got his points (moreso) in the context of the offense rather than isolating, and did a decent job of defending Monroe. He made a couple of bonehead plays in the last 90 seconds that directly lead to 4 points for Milwaukee, but defensive stupidity (especially when helping) is par for the course for most rookies.

Okafor is very good at being what he is...I just don't think that what he is is particularly valuable. An isolation scorer who doesn't defend, create many looks for others, shoot 3's, or get to the FT line a ton just isn't going to create or prevent enough PPP to help you win games. It's easy to point to "Philly sucks", but they are even worse than they were last year, from a PPP perspective. They're scoring 93.0 points per 100 possession this year, down from 95.5 per 100 last year. Both were/are last in the NBA. While it would be disingenuous to lay all of that at Okafor's feet, or the Laker's improvement in this respect at Russell's, but the Lakers have jumped from 24th in that category to 7th this year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:21 am    Post subject:

Oak is def changing the way that the 76ers wanted to play. Pace/Space is tough with Oak demanding the ball in the post.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PROPHET
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Jul 2001
Posts: 4356
Location: Oxnard, CA - The Nard

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:29 am    Post subject:

I need to see Russell in a different system, actually this whole team but especially Russell. The one thing I did notice about Russell and I missed it earlier is that he gets really easy looks at that basket with his jumper, he's just not making them even going back to summer league. Coming around picks he has that midrange J all day, just can't seem to knock them down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58436

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 1:07 pm    Post subject:

Philly would look like a completely different team if they actually had intentions to win ball games, surround Noel/Okafor with some 3 point shooters, and a point guard that was at least starting caliber. It's debatable if anyone on that roster is starter worthy, outside of Noel/Okafor. It's debatable even if their 3rd/4th/5th best players would even break the rotation of the Lakers - the 0-4 Lakers who have bench players that would easily start on the Sixers with Lou, Young etc.

For instance give them what Anthony Davis and Omer Asik have had in NOR the last 2 years -
Noel
Okafor
Evans
Gordon
Holiday
6th man Ryan Anderson

And this Sixer team is completely different in how it executes. Just the talent level of what Noel/Okafor are playing with is just a huge disadvantage, never mind they're still learning how to play and win at this level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:52 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
mhan00 wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I don't think it was he offense per se that deterred the Lakers. It was his defense and how they projected him going forward on that end. No doubt okafor's offense is pretty advanced now. I don't think many disagreed on that end.


And it was that they thought they could nab Deandre Jordan or Lamarcus in free agency


I hope that isn't true,because if it is then that shows a level of delusion I'm not comfortable with our front office having.


I don't think it was a clear cut, "we have DJ or LMA in the bag" kind of thinking.

More like looking at the lay of the land FA-wise. Just in terms of more polished big men FAs, there were:

LMA, DJ, Lopez x2, Hibbert (trade), Monroe, Chandler, etc.



I also think the Lakers realize that Randle has to put in some work to become an even average defender, and you can't succeed with a C-PF combo where both guys are below-average defenders.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:24 pm    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
Philly would look like a completely different team if they actually had intentions to win ball games, surround Noel/Okafor with some 3 point shooters, and a point guard that was at least starting caliber. It's debatable if anyone on that roster is starter worthy, outside of Noel/Okafor. It's debatable even if their 3rd/4th/5th best players would even break the rotation of the Lakers - the 0-4 Lakers who have bench players that would easily start on the Sixers with Lou, Young etc.

For instance give them what Anthony Davis and Omer Asik have had in NOR the last 2 years -
Noel
Okafor
Evans
Gordon
Holiday
6th man Ryan Anderson

And this Sixer team is completely different in how it executes. Just the talent level of what Noel/Okafor are playing with is just a huge disadvantage, never mind they're still learning how to play and win at this level.


To be frank if Embiid was healthy it would have changed their calculations. i think the Lakers picking DLO really screwed their plans. 76er fans were openly listing over DLO in their pace and space scheme.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144592
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 4:20 pm    Post subject:

kaoss128 wrote:
I'm far more worried we'll regret not taking Porzingis than Okafor.

Also I wonder if we ever actually tried offering our two first round picks to Minnesota. I know many on LG were against it.


According to Emplay, the Lakers had DLO and Porky over Okafor. He said that Okafor tanked his Laker workouts.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90324
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:17 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
mhan00 wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I don't think it was he offense per se that deterred the Lakers. It was his defense and how they projected him going forward on that end. No doubt okafor's offense is pretty advanced now. I don't think many disagreed on that end.


And it was that they thought they could nab Deandre Jordan or Lamarcus in free agency


I hope that isn't true,because if it is then that shows a level of delusion I'm not comfortable with our front office having.


I don't think it was a clear cut, "we have DJ or LMA in the bag" kind of thinking.

More like looking at the lay of the land FA-wise. Just in terms of more polished big men FAs, there were:

LMA, DJ, Lopez x2, Hibbert (trade), Monroe, Chandler, etc.



I also think the Lakers realize that Randle has to put in some work to become an even average defender, and you can't succeed with a C-PF combo where both guys are below-average defenders.


Another piece of the calculation is when you have two guys you like relatively equally (assuming they liked Porzingas equally or near equally to Russell), then you look at fitting with your roster as something of a tiebreaker.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ExPatLkrFan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Jul 2004
Posts: 3996
Location: Mukdahan, Thailand

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:22 pm    Post subject:

Where are all those guys that were saying "No to Krispy Pork Fat?", now? We know you are out there. Being a Euro lowered his draft status.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39726

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:44 pm    Post subject:

Of all the rookies we keep talking about I think there is no doubt which one is a sure thing, that's Karl Towns. The rest of the rookies are all question marks in terms of long term success, not stats... wins.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Drifts
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 22 Nov 2004
Posts: 28428

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:49 pm    Post subject:

21 pts, 9/13... wow...
_________________
"Now, if life is coffee, then the jobs, money & position in society are the cups. They are just tools to hold & contain life, but the quality of life doesn't change. Sometimes, by concentrating only on the cup, we fail to enjoy the coffee in it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Drifts
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 22 Nov 2004
Posts: 28428

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 8:53 pm    Post subject:

mhan00 wrote:
Chronicle wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
I don't think it was he offense per se that deterred the Lakers. It was his defense and how they projected him going forward on that end. No doubt okafor's offense is pretty advanced now. I don't think many disagreed on that end.


And it was that they thought they could nab Deandre Jordan or Lamarcus in free agency


I hope that isn't true,because if it is then that shows a level of delusion I'm not comfortable with our front office having.


Byron Scott actually spilled the beans. not drafting a big was because they felt the free agent market had a lot of bigs to offer... they end up signing Plan D Hibbert.
_________________
"Now, if life is coffee, then the jobs, money & position in society are the cups. They are just tools to hold & contain life, but the quality of life doesn't change. Sometimes, by concentrating only on the cup, we fail to enjoy the coffee in it."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bol
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 4045

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:25 pm    Post subject:

Showing that any rookie can stink it up, Mr. Towns went 3-13 for 6 points and 4 boards. Mudiay had another weak performance too. Okafor probably the most consistent rookie so far statistically.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fiendishoc
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 8488
Location: The (real) short corner

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 11:35 pm    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
That was Okafor's best game last night. He got his points (moreso) in the context of the offense rather than isolating, and did a decent job of defending Monroe. He made a couple of bonehead plays in the last 90 seconds that directly lead to 4 points for Milwaukee, but defensive stupidity (especially when helping) is par for the course for most rookies.

Okafor is very good at being what he is...I just don't think that what he is is particularly valuable. An isolation scorer who doesn't defend, create many looks for others, shoot 3's, or get to the FT line a ton just isn't going to create or prevent enough PPP to help you win games. It's easy to point to "Philly sucks", but they are even worse than they were last year, from a PPP perspective. They're scoring 93.0 points per 100 possession this year, down from 95.5 per 100 last year. Both were/are last in the NBA. While it would be disingenuous to lay all of that at Okafor's feet, or the Laker's improvement in this respect at Russell's, but the Lakers have jumped from 24th in that category to 7th this year.


This is what GT and I were talking about pre-draft.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
fiendishoc
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 8488
Location: The (real) short corner

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 1:01 am    Post subject:

For those curious, the numbers for DLO and Clarkson are:

With both: 96.5
W/ JC, no DLO: 109.5
W/ DLO, no JC: 111.8

They were both 118 in the past game, which is a step towards learning to play together.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:23 am    Post subject:

fiendishoc wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
That was Okafor's best game last night. He got his points (moreso) in the context of the offense rather than isolating, and did a decent job of defending Monroe. He made a couple of bonehead plays in the last 90 seconds that directly lead to 4 points for Milwaukee, but defensive stupidity (especially when helping) is par for the course for most rookies.

Okafor is very good at being what he is...I just don't think that what he is is particularly valuable. An isolation scorer who doesn't defend, create many looks for others, shoot 3's, or get to the FT line a ton just isn't going to create or prevent enough PPP to help you win games. It's easy to point to "Philly sucks", but they are even worse than they were last year, from a PPP perspective. They're scoring 93.0 points per 100 possession this year, down from 95.5 per 100 last year. Both were/are last in the NBA. While it would be disingenuous to lay all of that at Okafor's feet, or the Laker's improvement in this respect at Russell's, but the Lakers have jumped from 24th in that category to 7th this year.


This is what GT and I were talking about pre-draft.



People just go "OMG 21 point on 9/13 FG...amazing!" and have no grasp of how it impacts the team.

This is good stuff. Where'd you get it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GoldenThroat
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 37474

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:32 am    Post subject:

Mudiay is 4-17 (23.5%) on his shot attempts within 5 feet of the basket, and has had his shot blocked 7 times in these circumstances. #blowbyspeed #breakpeopledown
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mike@LG
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Apr 2001
Posts: 65135
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:34 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
Mudiay is 4-17 (23.5%) on his shot attempts within 5 feet of the basket, and has had his shot blocked 7 times in these circumstances. #blowbyspeed #breakpeopledown


#Fisherwasabetterfinisher
_________________
Resident Car Nut.

https://lakersdraft.substack.com/

I am not an economic advisor nor do I advise economic strategies or plans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersMD
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Jun 2003
Posts: 8038

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 7:40 am    Post subject:

GoldenThroat wrote:
fiendishoc wrote:
GoldenThroat wrote:
That was Okafor's best game last night. He got his points (moreso) in the context of the offense rather than isolating, and did a decent job of defending Monroe. He made a couple of bonehead plays in the last 90 seconds that directly lead to 4 points for Milwaukee, but defensive stupidity (especially when helping) is par for the course for most rookies.

Okafor is very good at being what he is...I just don't think that what he is is particularly valuable. An isolation scorer who doesn't defend, create many looks for others, shoot 3's, or get to the FT line a ton just isn't going to create or prevent enough PPP to help you win games. It's easy to point to "Philly sucks", but they are even worse than they were last year, from a PPP perspective. They're scoring 93.0 points per 100 possession this year, down from 95.5 per 100 last year. Both were/are last in the NBA. While it would be disingenuous to lay all of that at Okafor's feet, or the Laker's improvement in this respect at Russell's, but the Lakers have jumped from 24th in that category to 7th this year.


This is what GT and I were talking about pre-draft.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CTG0nltWUAAfKws.jpg


People just go "OMG 21 point on 9/13 FG...amazing!" and have no grasp of how it impacts the team.

This is good stuff. Where'd you get it?


Ditto. Great stuff.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144592
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2015 10:18 am    Post subject:

ExPatLkrFan wrote:
Where are all those guys that were saying "No to Krispy Pork Fat?", now? We know you are out there. Being a Euro lowered his draft status.


Not me, once I saw some film on him I was impressed.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 89, 90, 91  Next
Page 5 of 91
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB