Joined: 23 Jun 2005 Posts: 8488 Location: The (real) short corner
Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2017 10:22 pm Post subject:
TooMuchMajicBuss wrote:
LakerLanny wrote:
adkindo wrote:
LakerLanny wrote:
^Yet Lonzo had 0 turnovers and the best plus/minus on his team, while DLO had 4 turnovers and was average in plus/minus compared to the rest of his team.
the zero turnovers is great.....but his usage % was probably significantly lower than DLo's....still, zero TO's is always good......not sure the rest of what you said means anything.
LOL, give it up the war is over...you guys lost.
Define "you guys" Lanny. We won. 124-112. That goes for those of us Laker fans who see value in DLO, and those who don't. I didn't see anyone pissed that we were pulling away from Brooklyn in the second half.
Don't you know that single game plus minus is how someone who was pining for Okafor well after his expiry date "wins"?
Exactly! Such a fun game. Came here and read the last few pages - pain reading all the DLO talk. Who cares, he's gone. We won the trade. People need to move on.
Why do people keep saying that trading Dlo gave us Kuzma? We would’ve still got him at 28 And No the nets weren’t going to pick Kuzma if they kept the pick.
cause Kuzma is really good, and by including him it strengthens their desired narrative....it's little more than a futile exercise in "wagging the dog"....
Or, that is exactly what ACTUALLY HAPPENED. Not the line you are pushing that is based on conjecture built around an assumption that may or may have not come to fruition. You are actually doing the exact thing that you are accusing others of. Shameful at best.
^Yet Lonzo had 0 turnovers and the best plus/minus on his team, while DLO had 4 turnovers and was average in plus/minus compared to the rest of his team.
the zero turnovers is great.....but his usage % was probably significantly lower than DLo's....still, zero TO's is always good......not sure the rest of what you said means anything.
LOL, give it up the war is over...you guys lost.
Define "you guys" Lanny. We won. 124-112. That goes for those of us Laker fans who see value in DLO, and those who don't. I didn't see anyone pissed that we were pulling away from Brooklyn in the second half.
Don't you know that single game plus minus is how someone who was pining for Okafor well after his expiry date "wins"?
LakerLanny is, and always has been, a joke. I don't even think he's ever acknowledged how wrong he was on Okafor, let alone self-reflect on why he was so damn wrong.
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 Posts: 40345 Location: Dirty South
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2017 10:01 pm Post subject:
billyjoegunrak wrote:
adkindo wrote:
0514 wrote:
Why do people keep saying that trading Dlo gave us Kuzma? We would’ve still got him at 28 And No the nets weren’t going to pick Kuzma if they kept the pick.
cause Kuzma is really good, and by including him it strengthens their desired narrative....it's little more than a futile exercise in "wagging the dog"....
Or, that is exactly what ACTUALLY HAPPENED. Not the line you are pushing that is based on conjecture built around an assumption that may or may have not come to fruition. You are actually doing the exact thing that you are accusing others of. Shameful at best.
wag that dog......it is not conjecture, all of the relevant evidence points to Kuzma being drafted early in the 2nd round.
I dont know. It's hard to have a discussion about "who won a trade" when one party wants to use a hypothetical (no matter how educated a hypothetical it is) vs one party that wants to use the events that actually happened. So good luck to ya'll haha.
Either way, no one would really care about the #27 this much if Kuzma wasn't good. I'm glad he's this good and you guys are having this ridiculous back and forth about it
All times are GMT - 8 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3 ... 75, 76, 77
Page 77 of 77
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum